Re: [心得] 警特跳遠屁股往後坐GG的心得分享
先聲明 我不是沒過的考生
老實講 今年改成第一次試跳不計成績 完全不合理也沒必要
體測的目的是甚麼? 不就是測驗耐力(跑步)跟爆發力(跳遠)嗎
現在爆發力變成是在考立定跳遠的姿勢.技巧嗎...
像原PO可以跳230.250的你跟我說他爆發力不夠嗎?
再說一次 考的應該是"爆發力" 不是立定跳遠技巧
爆發力不夠的 你給他跳5次都不會過 而且只會越跳越短越沒力
今年改成一次的意義到底在哪 是想省時嗎?
要省時那乾脆連試跳的機會都不給阿 大家還不是幾乎都兩跳
然後 體測跟筆試的意義根本不同 別在說啥筆試也只有一次機會了
難道你要跟我說跳230的但因為小疏失所以爆發力輸技巧好跳190的?
在強調一次 考立定跳遠意義不應該是考立定跳遠的技巧
跑步因為時間長不可能再重跑 而且運氣成分低
跳兩次記兩次成績這種實務上可以辦到的事 為甚麼不給考生更多機會證明自己
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.237.252.73
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Examination/M.1476173101.A.55F.html
→
10/11 16:06, , 1F
10/11 16:06, 1F
→
10/11 16:06, , 2F
10/11 16:06, 2F
→
10/11 16:16, , 3F
10/11 16:16, 3F
推
10/11 16:21, , 4F
10/11 16:21, 4F
是喔?
推
10/11 16:29, , 5F
10/11 16:29, 5F
推
10/11 16:30, , 6F
10/11 16:30, 6F
都一樣是公平 沒代表合理
推
10/11 16:33, , 7F
10/11 16:33, 7F
測爆發力最快的方法阿 但運氣成分很重就是了
推
10/11 16:36, , 8F
10/11 16:36, 8F
不反對 但踩線或墊子鞋子很滑滑倒跟協調性有關係嗎 第一跳不計成績的意義在哪
※ 編輯: g794136 (36.237.252.73), 10/11/2016 16:41:17
※ 編輯: g794136 (36.237.252.73), 10/11/2016 16:41:47
推
10/11 16:48, , 9F
10/11 16:48, 9F
推
10/11 16:49, , 10F
10/11 16:49, 10F
推
10/11 16:53, , 11F
10/11 16:53, 11F
→
10/11 16:53, , 12F
10/11 16:53, 12F
推
10/11 16:57, , 13F
10/11 16:57, 13F
推
10/11 16:58, , 14F
10/11 16:58, 14F
推
10/11 16:58, , 15F
10/11 16:58, 15F
→
10/11 16:58, , 16F
10/11 16:58, 16F
→
10/11 16:59, , 17F
10/11 16:59, 17F
→
10/11 17:08, , 18F
10/11 17:08, 18F
→
10/11 17:08, , 19F
10/11 17:08, 19F
噓
10/11 17:09, , 20F
10/11 17:09, 20F
推
10/11 17:12, , 21F
10/11 17:12, 21F
→
10/11 17:12, , 22F
10/11 17:12, 22F
→
10/11 17:13, , 23F
10/11 17:13, 23F
推
10/11 17:20, , 24F
10/11 17:20, 24F
→
10/11 17:23, , 25F
10/11 17:23, 25F
→
10/11 17:23, , 26F
10/11 17:23, 26F
→
10/11 17:25, , 27F
10/11 17:25, 27F
→
10/11 17:25, , 28F
10/11 17:25, 28F
→
10/11 17:26, , 29F
10/11 17:26, 29F
推
10/11 17:27, , 30F
10/11 17:27, 30F
→
10/11 17:27, , 31F
10/11 17:27, 31F
→
10/11 17:27, , 32F
10/11 17:27, 32F
推
10/11 17:29, , 33F
10/11 17:29, 33F
推
10/11 17:32, , 34F
10/11 17:32, 34F
推
10/11 17:41, , 35F
10/11 17:41, 35F
還有 61 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
10/11 22:09, , 97F
10/11 22:09, 97F
→
10/11 22:10, , 98F
10/11 22:10, 98F
→
10/11 22:10, , 99F
10/11 22:10, 99F
→
10/11 22:20, , 100F
10/11 22:20, 100F
推
10/11 22:24, , 101F
10/11 22:24, 101F
→
10/11 22:24, , 102F
10/11 22:24, 102F
推
10/11 22:25, , 103F
10/11 22:25, 103F
→
10/11 22:25, , 104F
10/11 22:25, 104F
→
10/11 22:25, , 105F
10/11 22:25, 105F
推
10/11 22:31, , 106F
10/11 22:31, 106F
→
10/11 22:31, , 107F
10/11 22:31, 107F
→
10/11 22:31, , 108F
10/11 22:31, 108F
推
10/11 23:12, , 109F
10/11 23:12, 109F
→
10/11 23:12, , 110F
10/11 23:12, 110F
推
10/11 23:29, , 111F
10/11 23:29, 111F
→
10/11 23:31, , 112F
10/11 23:31, 112F
→
10/11 23:32, , 113F
10/11 23:32, 113F
→
10/12 00:17, , 114F
10/12 00:17, 114F
推
10/12 02:59, , 115F
10/12 02:59, 115F
推
10/12 09:05, , 116F
10/12 09:05, 116F
推
10/12 09:49, , 117F
10/12 09:49, 117F
推
10/12 10:34, , 118F
10/12 10:34, 118F
→
10/12 10:34, , 119F
10/12 10:34, 119F
推
10/12 10:57, , 120F
10/12 10:57, 120F
推
10/12 11:53, , 121F
10/12 11:53, 121F
推
10/12 12:42, , 122F
10/12 12:42, 122F
→
10/12 12:42, , 123F
10/12 12:42, 123F
噓
10/12 12:47, , 124F
10/12 12:47, 124F
推
10/12 13:19, , 125F
10/12 13:19, 125F
→
10/12 13:19, , 126F
10/12 13:19, 126F
→
10/12 13:19, , 127F
10/12 13:19, 127F
→
10/12 13:19, , 128F
10/12 13:19, 128F
推
10/12 14:52, , 129F
10/12 14:52, 129F
→
10/12 14:52, , 130F
10/12 14:52, 130F
→
10/13 09:12, , 131F
10/13 09:12, 131F
→
10/13 09:14, , 132F
10/13 09:14, 132F
→
10/13 09:14, , 133F
10/13 09:14, 133F
→
10/13 18:51, , 134F
10/13 18:51, 134F
推
10/13 19:02, , 135F
10/13 19:02, 135F
推
01/18 23:49, , 136F
01/18 23:49, 136F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
心得
56
106