Re: Randomness

看板EngTalk作者 (ChemPingTango!)時間15年前 (2009/01/24 20:36), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串4/4 (看更多)
※ 引述《fizeau (.)》之銘言: : Maybe the existent rules in our universe are only scarce, you know, : an atom is comprised of a core surrounded by electrons, of which : the primary force is open to debate and theory. : So an entity with the so-called life is the same--consisting of : numerous atoms, condensing into functional unit blocks. An evolution : from disorder to order. I just read quickly and can't catch exactly what you try to express. Anyway, just want to share some information. In nature science, for classical view, the world is divided into two category, wave and matter; while for quantum mechanic view, they are the same. But, it is heard that there is a more advanced theory, string theory, which claims that all things is composed of varieties of "string!" It involves a lot of mathmatics but is more possible to explain something that both Newton physics and quantum mechanics fail. Therefore, for one that study string theory, they would disagree that particle is composed of nucleus and electron. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.120.214.154
文章代碼(AID): #19Umipb3 (EngTalk)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #19Umipb3 (EngTalk)