Re: Randomness
I have to continue with this, in light of my long-time curiosity
about how to produce a huge volume of interconnected words as in
a novel. Of course it might just be due to my lack of literature-reading.
Anyway I'm going to conduct an experiment, which is I'll keep
typing off words just for the sake of manufacturing instead of
really having been inspired, and see what'd happen. My guess of hope
is that the genuine inspiration will come out inadvertently, so
you just keep putting your thoughts into seemingly logical threads
and soon later on you'll find a way to make it worthwhile.
Needless to say, reading a lot of literary works of fame is the
fundamental. No one can omit that part and I'm no exception. I'm
just doing both at the same time. And I see nothing wrong to it.
--
Maybe the existent rules in our universe are only scarce, you know,
an atom is comprised of a core surrounded by electrons, of which
the primary force is open to debate and theory.
So an entity with the so-called life is the same--consisting of
numerous atoms, condensing into functional unit blocks. An evolution
from disorder to order.
Suppose the life means the consciousness. That is, you are endowed
with life because you can feel "your own consciousness." Right
the moment when you die, you've been dispossessed of your consciousness,
so you no longer have a life. Everything ever since becomes meaningless.
Say, an electron, does it have an awareness of its own existence?
Even if it's aware of itself, would it be able to differentiate itself
from another electron? By what, except for the position relative to
the core they revolve around?
If it cannot, then what makes us humans able to do that--you know you
are distinct from another human even if he or she is your twin sibling.
You look alike, even think alike. Then how can you be so sure that
you haven't become "him" or "her," instead of remaining yourself as
the last passing moment.
From an evolutionary point of view, for the good of mankind, the only
benefit from staying alive without the bound of senescence, is that
way one gets to maintain the information stored in the brain intact,
which hopefully might be valuable.
So if one day there's a way to extract all those data out of a brain
and render into recognizable, readable format, no one would have to
worry anymore?
Imagine a scientist manage to do this, copying the cerebral data and
secure it somewhere. Maybe hundreds or thousands of years afterwards,
it is unearthed and routed into a new body. There's going to be a clash
since the original data contains the old body information such as the
immunity condition. Not entirely match.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.44.133.221
推
01/23 23:39, , 1F
01/23 23:39, 1F
→
01/23 23:39, , 2F
01/23 23:39, 2F
→
01/23 23:39, , 3F
01/23 23:39, 3F
推
01/23 23:45, , 4F
01/23 23:45, 4F
→
01/23 23:46, , 5F
01/23 23:46, 5F
→
01/23 23:46, , 6F
01/23 23:46, 6F
→
01/23 23:47, , 7F
01/23 23:47, 7F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):