[文法] seem/appear(to be)的用法

看板Eng-Class作者 (QQ)時間7年前 (2016/12/10 11:30), 7年前編輯推噓2(207)
留言9則, 5人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
大家好,請問一下 想釐清seem/appear (to be)的用法,看到牛津英語用法指南PEU是這樣寫的: 條目507.3 seem "Seem to be" is normal before noun phrases. I looked through the binoculars: it "seemed to be" some sort of large rat. (NOT ... it seemed some sort of large rat.) I spoke to a man who "seemed to be" the boss. (NOT ... who seemed the boss.) However, "to be" can be dropped before noun phrases which express more subjective feelings. She "seems (to be) " a nice girl. The cup "seemed" almost doll's size in his hands. It "seems" a pity, but I can't see you this weekend. (NOT It seems to be a pity ... ) 以上是書中內容,但我覺得這有模糊地帶, 例如I spoke to a man who "seemed to be" the boss.難道就不能這是我的「主觀」 感受而寫成who seemed the boss? 總之,這解釋似乎會有自由心證的部分? 請教一下。謝謝! 原文http://i.imgur.com/FSVuDe5.jpg
-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.25.218.26 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1481340610.A.5CF.html ※ 編輯: scju (114.25.218.26), 12/10/2016 12:20:48

12/10 13:49, , 1F
會不會是她是不是好女孩,答案每個人的主觀判斷不同;但他
12/10 13:49, 1F

12/10 13:50, , 2F
是不是老闆,卻有一個客觀的答案存在,不因主觀判斷而改變
12/10 13:50, 2F

12/10 19:32, , 3F
原文不就寫了the difference is not always clear-cut,
12/10 19:32, 3F

12/10 19:32, , 4F
and both are often possible.
12/10 19:32, 4F

12/11 15:02, , 6F
seem情態內涵也有分主觀、客觀意義,前者是說話者自
12/11 15:02, 6F

12/11 15:02, , 7F
己隨意添加如感覺,後者是說話者腦補他人意見如據信
12/11 15:02, 7F

12/11 15:02, , 8F
(+be判斷)
12/11 15:02, 8F

12/20 13:39, , 9F
感謝回應!
12/20 13:39, 9F
目前傾向理解為: 「客觀事物」(是不是這個人事物)與「主觀感覺」(我對這個人事物的感覺)的差別。 ※ 編輯: scju (1.169.78.190), 12/20/2016 13:44:41
文章代碼(AID): #1OItR2NF (Eng-Class)
文章代碼(AID): #1OItR2NF (Eng-Class)