Re: [文法] 詞典解釋中的「,that..」及「,are...」

看板Eng-Class作者時間9年前 (2016/09/28 02:22), 9年前編輯推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
Huddleston and Pullum (The Cambridge Grammar of Modern English, 2002.1025) say that "who" and "which" are normally (my emphasis) used in non-restrictive clause, but add that some speakers do accept "that." I use "who" and "which," but accept "that." https://goo.gl/Qag0K9 -- ※ 編輯: perspicuity (118.165.144.58), 09/28/2016 17:04:36
‣ 更多 perspicuity 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1NwhZbzc (Eng-Class)
‣ 更多 perspicuity 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1NwhZbzc (Eng-Class)