Re: [文法] whose N = the N of whom
※ 引述《togs (= =")》之銘言：
: 在文法書上有讀到這一句: whose N = the N of which
按照句法觀點來說，這個規則錯了，因為'whose'就是換限定詞組的relativizer，
但'which'就是換名詞組的。
按照語義觀點來說，他們的意思差不多了，但你不用總是用'the'。
還有，如果那個名詞組指出施動者（或人類）的話，要用'who(m)'代替以上的'which'。
1.1.）I like this book.
1.2.) **This book's* contents* are fascinating.
1.) I like this book, whose contents are fascinating.
2.1.) I like this book.
2.2.) *The contents of *this book** are fascinating.
2.) I like this book, the contents of which are fascinating.
3.1.) Lil' John is black.
3.2.) **Lil' John's* father* was a doctor.
3.) Lil' John, **whose* father* was a doctor, is black.
4.1.) Lil' John is black.
4.2.) *The father of *Lil' John** was a doctor.
4.) Lil' John, *the father of *whom** was a doctor, is black.
不過，生來就說英語的人不會用"NP's N"代替"NP of NP"。
看著兩個例句：
5.1.) A trader has 400kg of rice.
5.2.) A trader sells *a part of that *400kg of rice** for profit.
5.) A trader has 400kg of rice, *a part of *which** he sells for profit.
6.1.) A trader has 400kg of rice.
6.2.) A trader sells **that 400kg of rice's* part* for profit. (怪)
6.) A trader has 400kg of rice, **whose* part* he sells for profit. (怪)
勸告：不要相信台灣的私營出版社，因為其中大部分的人員都沒有學語言學。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.214.133.110
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1443314618.A.4D0.html
→
09/27 15:18, , 1F
09/27 15:18, 1F
推
09/27 21:22, , 2F
09/27 21:22, 2F
推
09/27 22:49, , 3F
09/27 22:49, 3F
→
09/27 22:49, , 4F
09/27 22:49, 4F
→
09/27 22:50, , 5F
09/27 22:50, 5F
→
09/27 22:51, , 6F
09/27 22:51, 6F
→
09/27 22:51, , 7F
09/27 22:51, 7F
→
09/27 22:52, , 8F
09/27 22:52, 8F
→
09/27 22:54, , 9F
09/27 22:54, 9F
→
09/27 22:55, , 10F
09/27 22:55, 10F
→
09/27 22:55, , 11F
09/27 22:55, 11F
→
09/27 22:57, , 12F
09/27 22:57, 12F
→
09/27 22:58, , 13F
09/27 22:58, 13F
推
09/28 12:51, , 14F
09/28 12:51, 14F
推
09/29 00:22, , 15F
09/29 00:22, 15F
→
09/29 00:22, , 16F
09/29 00:22, 16F
推
09/29 08:16, , 17F
09/29 08:16, 17F
※ 編輯: theyangist (117.19.19.106), 10/02/2015 04:53:44
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：