[文法] whose N = the N of whom

看板Eng-Class作者 (= =")時間10年前 (2015/09/25 09:17), 編輯推噓1(106)
留言7則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
在文法書上有讀到這一句: whose N = the N of which I like this book, the contents of which are fascinating. 於是想請教 whose N = the N of whom 這樣的句子正確否? (或是台灣多數認為錯誤或沒提到) 例如 I like John, the father of whom is a doctor. (以下有個人綜合文法書後得到的看法 在賴世雄的<實用英文文法>書中第150頁提到, "whose除可代替人以外,亦可代替物。唯代替物時 whose + n = the n of which" 換言之,這本書沒提到是否 whose + n = the n of whom 網路上有看見有人說到 whose + n = the n of whom 這樣的文法 而我用google查詢時,發現以下例句: 1. Her slave girl gave birth to a son, the father of whom is Jacob her own husband 2. In May, 1997, Kent, Washington, elementary school teacher Mary Kay LeTourneau, 35, gave birth to a baby girl, the father of whom is one of her sixth-graders. 3. The cause of this quarrel was undoubtedly a child, the father of whom is said to be Louis Kircher. 因此應該是有這樣的規則 whose n = the n of whom 不過目前手邊只有2本文法書 沒看見書上面提到,不太確定於是上來請教一下前輩們 謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.113.208.125 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1443143828.A.00B.html

09/25 21:16, , 1F
當然是可以那麼寫
09/25 21:16, 1F

09/25 21:19, , 2F
不過人通常直接's就好,不需要the N of吧(?
09/25 21:19, 2F

09/25 21:21, , 3F
然後看著看著想問第一個例句如果這樣寫有沒有問題,總覺得
09/25 21:21, 3F

09/25 21:21, , 4F
念起來怪怪的I like the book which the content of...
09/25 21:21, 4F

09/25 21:33, , 5F
感謝^^
09/25 21:33, 5F

09/26 16:03, , 6F
啊,對了不知道會不會被誤會,我是想說不知道寫成我後面打
09/26 16:03, 6F

09/26 16:03, , 7F
的那樣有沒有問題
09/26 16:03, 7F
文章代碼(AID): #1M1A2K0B (Eng-Class)
文章代碼(AID): #1M1A2K0B (Eng-Class)