Re: [考題] 高普考英文(高點出版)

看板Eng-Class作者 (神)時間12年前 (2013/08/13 22:22), 編輯推噓3(3推 0噓 15→)
留言18則, 5人參與, 6年前最新討論串3/5 (看更多)
抱歉又再次打擾了 1. Something was wrong with the window; it ___ not open. 答案是 would 為何不能選 should 呢 2. It is to be regretted that their parents ___ have quarreled. 選項是 would should could might 答案是should 這題毫無頭緒... 3. I would have called you, ___. 答案是 but I forgot your telephone number. 我選 but I had forgotten your telephone number. 想法是 本來我要打給你(但沒打) 但我忘記你的電話號碼 「忘記你的電話」 在時間序列上比過去時間點「打給你」還更前面 所以選擇過去完成式 請問是錯在哪呢 感謝回答囉 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.36.188.143
→
08/13 22:54, , 1F
1. should 意思不對。我就用中文來打個比方好了(相同情境/
08/13 22:54, 1F
→
08/13 22:54, , 2F
意思下，我轉成用我們自己中文的習慣說法)-->
08/13 22:54, 2F
→
08/13 22:54, , 3F
甲:你們這窗是不是有問題啊，怎麼打不開
08/13 22:54, 3F
→
08/13 22:54, , 4F
乙:你們這窗是不是有問題啊，這窗戶不應該打得開
08/13 22:54, 4F
→
08/13 22:55, , 5F
(NOTE: 倒是"你們" 這個設定是我自己加的)
08/13 22:55, 5F
→
08/13 22:55, , 6F
08/13 22:55, 6F
→
08/13 22:55, , 7F
比如我用 1 的RIGHT THING這基本意思來舉例。"窗戶打不開"
08/13 22:55, 7F
→
08/13 22:55, , 8F
才是"對的" (打的開反而奇怪/不對) --> 所以這語意不合
08/13 22:55, 8F
→
08/13 22:56, , 9F
2的ADVICE不合語意. 3. 基本上算是1的延伸 ... 其它的你自
08/13 22:56, 9F
→
08/13 22:56, , 10F
己一個一個的對照/比較 你自己查 "would"
08/13 22:56, 10F
推
08/13 22:57, , 11F
1用現在式想你就懂了 is,will 語意問題
08/13 22:57, 11F
推
08/13 23:00, , 12F
3 意涵條件句 省略(if I had remembered ur fone number.)
08/13 23:00, 12F
→
08/13 23:09, , 13F
感謝啊 1耍笨整個會錯意 請問2是題目有問題嗎
08/13 23:09, 13F
推
08/13 23:27, , 14F
2看不出來他想問啥 話說WOULD HAVE和SHOULD HAVE
08/13 23:27, 14F
→
08/13 23:28, , 15F
好像都可以表達應做未做的意思 請問這樣怎區別啊
08/13 23:28, 15F
→
08/14 00:40, , 16F
08/14 00:40, 16F
→
08/14 08:24, , 17F
太感謝了...這麼冷僻的用法
08/14 08:24, 17F
→
04/13 23:01, 6年前 , 18F
2看不出來他想問啥 話 https://muxiv.com
04/13 23:01, 18F
‣ 更多 IBelieveIAm 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1I2a48_a (Eng-Class)
‣ 更多 IBelieveIAm 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1I2a48_a (Eng-Class)