[文法] 請問be meant to V 和 be meant Ving ꤠ…

看板Eng-Class作者 (To Kill a Mockingbird)時間14年前 (2011/08/13 17:34), 編輯推噓1(1010)
留言11則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
我有個小問題,be meant to V 和 be meant Ving 和 be meant to be 的差異 最後一個be meant to be在google dictionary裡有找到: to be generally considered to be something 被普遍認為是 但是前兩個我就不知道了,上網看了很亂,有人說 be meant to do……打算做某事 = in order to do be meant doing……意味著…… 但也有人說 be meant to do = should 可以請知道的人幫我釐清一下嗎?謝謝! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 120.118.241.235 ※ 編輯: AtticusFinch 來自: 120.118.241.235 (08/13 17:35)

08/13 17:49, , 1F
meant是過去式和過去分詞 應該是be mean to 才對
08/13 17:49, 1F

08/13 17:50, , 3F
喔 對不起 我搞錯了 但是上面那個字點連結沒錯
08/13 17:50, 3F

08/13 17:51, , 4F
字典
08/13 17:51, 4F

08/13 17:52, , 5F
簡單說 就是 mean to do something 打算作
08/13 17:52, 5F

08/13 17:52, , 6F
mean doing something 結果表示
08/13 17:52, 6F

08/13 17:53, , 7F
be meant to do = should
08/13 17:53, 7F

08/13 18:51, , 8F
謝謝Makino0711
08/13 18:51, 8F

08/14 02:25, , 9F
是to be meant沒錯,是被動,主詞被省略但仍可被猜出來是
08/14 02:25, 9F

08/14 02:25, , 10F
08/14 02:25, 10F

08/18 10:52, , 11F
Brits比較常用meant to 也可以英->英翻成supposed to
08/18 10:52, 11F
文章代碼(AID): #1EHaL3_9 (Eng-Class)
文章代碼(AID): #1EHaL3_9 (Eng-Class)