Re: [文法] CNN雜誌這段是否有錯?

看板Eng-Class作者balenoer (火球金魚)時間14年前 (2011/07/13 13:20)推噓1(1推 0噓 5→)

留言6則, 3人參與討論串2/4 (看更多)

不，小弟覺得是這樣裡怪怪的~ The public generally assumes that if one is selling S V ↑這個that後面整個是名詞子句當受詞用，沒錯。再來的if是條件子句也沒錯， something on the market, that we have had assurances that that device is safe. ↑但這怎又會多一個that? 應該是沒有that才對阿。因為 we have had assurances...這句就是名詞子句裡頭的主詞+動詞+受詞了所以我認為正確是 The public generally assumes that if one is selling something on the market, we have had assurances that that device is safe. 不知道大家的意見是? ※ 引述《balenoer (火球金魚)》之銘言： : 小弟今天在看CNN英文雜誌，發現其中有一段話似乎怪怪的? : 是不是文法有問題阿，好像有多一個that?板上高手能幫忙 : 解答嗎?謝謝~ : The public generally assumes that if one is selling something : on the market, that we have had assurances that that device : is safe. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.20.187.2

→

mrhalliwell

07/13 14:18, , 1^F

07/13 14:18, 1^F

→

mrhalliwell

07/13 14:19, , 2^F

07/13 14:19, 2^F

→

mrhalliwell

07/13 14:20, , 3^F

07/13 14:20, 3^F