[請益] 請問這個句子

看板Eng-Class作者 (37303)時間15年前 (2010/09/23 15:48), 編輯推噓0(0推 0噓 14→)
留言14則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/3 (看更多)
Likewise, many don't realize that the claim that there are UFOs is a true and uncontroversial one simply because UFO is an acronym for unidentified flying object, of which there are many. 請問最後為什麼是of which 不是there are many UFOs嗎 非常感謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.184.233.189
→
09/23 17:11, , 1F
of which there are many= and there are many
09/23 17:11, 1F
→
09/23 17:12, , 2F
unidentified flying objects. 為什麼不寫UFOs?因為這個句
09/23 17:12, 2F
→
09/23 17:13, , 3F
子就是在強調很多人不知道unidentified flying object的
09/23 17:13, 3F
→
09/23 17:14, , 4F
acronym是UFO，再者which在這裡有連接詞的功用
09/23 17:14, 4F
→
09/23 18:56, , 5F
of which=and嗎??
09/23 18:56, 5F
→
09/23 18:56, , 6F
我想請問的意思是說of which there are many.這句還原
09/23 18:56, 6F
→
09/23 18:57, , 7F
不是there are many 不明飛行物 還原句沒有of阿??
09/23 18:57, 7F
→
09/23 19:26, , 8F
想想這句: "There are many of them."
09/23 19:26, 8F
→
09/23 21:29, , 9F
那請問可以不要of嗎 因為也可以不要用代名詞而用原來的
09/23 21:29, 9F
→
09/23 21:29, , 10F
不明飛行物
09/23 21:29, 10F
→
09/23 21:30, , 11F
還是說這樣寫比較正式 因為我看的是一個數學教授的文章
09/23 21:30, 11F
→
09/23 21:30, , 12F
他的文章寫的都文謅謅@@
09/23 21:30, 12F
→
09/24 08:01, , 13F
不要of是懶人寫法，一般還是要of
09/24 08:01, 13F
→
09/24 10:23, , 14F
非常感謝樓上各位:)
09/24 10:23, 14F
‣ 更多 xpower50 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1CcmOmmm (Eng-Class)
‣ 更多 xpower50 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1CcmOmmm (Eng-Class)