Re: [討論] 季中「選秀」蔣智賢or倪福德要選哪個?已回收
看板Elephants作者yankeerock (yankeerock)時間9年前 (2015/05/09 10:44)推噓37(37推 0噓 42→)留言79則, 32人參與討論串3/4 (看更多)
※ 引述《qweewqq (風一樣的男子)》之銘言:
: 今天陳冠宇在羅德一軍投不滿兩局就被KO下場
: 查了一下,他跟羅德簽了一年合約,所以最快若回來也是明年
: 今年參加選秀的可能大物,應該就是林哲瑄跟蔣智賢,還有王耀霖和倪福德
: 王耀霖雖然前幾年表現不錯,但今年投球不甚理想
: 但他只有25,26歲,也許簽來改造個1-2年可以期待
: 不過依照兄弟過往慣例,應該就是先選對戰績有直接幫助的
: 倪福德就是即戰力,但跟兄弟之前沒簽約
: 這次要是再被兄弟選中,可能就非簽不可了
: 倪福德好處是可以補強SP,這樣就可以繼續維持一洋投而洋砲的陣型
: 至於蔣智賢,毋寧是個強打者
: 不過本季他在日本打球,都是打DH,若到中職,是否會繼續打DH?
: 蔣智賢渾然就是個洋砲等級,這樣兄弟就可以換成二洋投一洋槍
: 打線既可以持平,投手也能變強
: 所以我覺得兄弟應該選蔣智賢的機率最大,林哲瑄的身手已不復當年
: 至於其他各隊打線火力猛,不知是否會以先補投手為優先考量
: 大家覺得今年選秀首要目標就是蔣智賢了嗎?
你實在有點lag,今年可能的大物來說,個人評價
蔣=林哲瑄 > 王柏融 > 倪福德 = 宋家豪 >>>>>>> 王耀霖
王耀霖前面感覺有太多人可以選了,個人覺得在王耀霖前面,
第二輪我其實想要林承飛,打擊好的高中生游擊手,
第三輪想要何昱德,打擊很好的三壘手,反正打擊好的三遊這麼少,
沒有閒多的道理。
如果真的選到王柏融,林承飛,何昱德,應該要拆一個洋砲不是問題。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.171.40.183
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Elephants/M.1431139441.A.2B9.html
推
05/09 10:47, , 1F
05/09 10:47, 1F
→
05/09 10:48, , 2F
05/09 10:48, 2F
→
05/09 10:49, , 3F
05/09 10:49, 3F
→
05/09 10:53, , 4F
05/09 10:53, 4F
→
05/09 10:54, , 5F
05/09 10:54, 5F
→
05/09 10:54, , 6F
05/09 10:54, 6F
→
05/09 10:55, , 7F
05/09 10:55, 7F
→
05/09 10:55, , 8F
05/09 10:55, 8F
推
05/09 11:00, , 9F
05/09 11:00, 9F
推
05/09 11:05, , 10F
05/09 11:05, 10F
→
05/09 11:20, , 11F
05/09 11:20, 11F
推
05/09 11:21, , 12F
05/09 11:21, 12F
推
05/09 11:22, , 13F
05/09 11:22, 13F
→
05/09 11:22, , 14F
05/09 11:22, 14F
推
05/09 11:27, , 15F
05/09 11:27, 15F
推
05/09 11:32, , 16F
05/09 11:32, 16F
推
05/09 11:33, , 17F
05/09 11:33, 17F
→
05/09 11:33, , 18F
05/09 11:33, 18F
推
05/09 11:36, , 19F
05/09 11:36, 19F
推
05/09 11:46, , 20F
05/09 11:46, 20F
推
05/09 11:47, , 21F
05/09 11:47, 21F
→
05/09 11:48, , 22F
05/09 11:48, 22F
推
05/09 11:51, , 23F
05/09 11:51, 23F
→
05/09 11:52, , 24F
05/09 11:52, 24F
→
05/09 11:53, , 25F
05/09 11:53, 25F
推
05/09 11:53, , 26F
05/09 11:53, 26F
→
05/09 11:54, , 27F
05/09 11:54, 27F
→
05/09 11:55, , 28F
05/09 11:55, 28F
推
05/09 12:11, , 29F
05/09 12:11, 29F
推
05/09 12:17, , 30F
05/09 12:17, 30F
推
05/09 12:28, , 31F
05/09 12:28, 31F
推
05/09 12:29, , 32F
05/09 12:29, 32F
推
05/09 12:34, , 33F
05/09 12:34, 33F
推
05/09 12:46, , 34F
05/09 12:46, 34F
→
05/09 12:46, , 35F
05/09 12:46, 35F
推
05/09 12:47, , 36F
05/09 12:47, 36F
推
05/09 12:49, , 37F
05/09 12:49, 37F
推
05/09 12:49, , 38F
05/09 12:49, 38F
→
05/09 12:49, , 39F
05/09 12:49, 39F
推
05/09 12:49, , 40F
05/09 12:49, 40F
→
05/09 12:50, , 41F
05/09 12:50, 41F
→
05/09 12:51, , 42F
05/09 12:51, 42F
推
05/09 12:54, , 43F
05/09 12:54, 43F
推
05/09 12:55, , 44F
05/09 12:55, 44F
推
05/09 12:59, , 45F
05/09 12:59, 45F
→
05/09 12:59, , 46F
05/09 12:59, 46F
→
05/09 13:00, , 47F
05/09 13:00, 47F
→
05/09 13:00, , 48F
05/09 13:00, 48F
推
05/09 13:01, , 49F
05/09 13:01, 49F
→
05/09 13:02, , 50F
05/09 13:02, 50F
→
05/09 13:02, , 51F
05/09 13:02, 51F
推
05/09 13:21, , 52F
05/09 13:21, 52F
推
05/09 13:21, , 53F
05/09 13:21, 53F
→
05/09 13:23, , 54F
05/09 13:23, 54F
→
05/09 13:24, , 55F
05/09 13:24, 55F
→
05/09 13:27, , 56F
05/09 13:27, 56F
→
05/09 13:28, , 57F
05/09 13:28, 57F
→
05/09 13:29, , 58F
05/09 13:29, 58F
推
05/09 13:30, , 59F
05/09 13:30, 59F
→
05/09 13:30, , 60F
05/09 13:30, 60F
→
05/09 13:30, , 61F
05/09 13:30, 61F
→
05/09 13:31, , 62F
05/09 13:31, 62F
→
05/09 13:31, , 63F
05/09 13:31, 63F
推
05/09 13:35, , 64F
05/09 13:35, 64F
→
05/09 13:36, , 65F
05/09 13:36, 65F
推
05/09 13:38, , 66F
05/09 13:38, 66F
→
05/09 14:29, , 67F
05/09 14:29, 67F
推
05/09 14:35, , 68F
05/09 14:35, 68F
推
05/09 14:37, , 69F
05/09 14:37, 69F
→
05/09 14:52, , 70F
05/09 14:52, 70F
→
05/09 15:49, , 71F
05/09 15:49, 71F
→
05/09 15:50, , 72F
05/09 15:50, 72F
→
05/09 15:52, , 73F
05/09 15:52, 73F
→
05/09 15:53, , 74F
05/09 15:53, 74F
推
05/09 16:31, , 75F
05/09 16:31, 75F
→
05/09 16:31, , 76F
05/09 16:31, 76F
推
05/09 17:42, , 77F
05/09 17:42, 77F
推
05/09 17:45, , 78F
05/09 17:45, 78F
→
05/09 19:29, , 79F
05/09 19:29, 79F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):