Re: [轉播] 九上 兄弟 0:3 義大 陳智弘(換投)(代打)已回收
看板Elephants作者Sizemore24 (newborn in Phillies)時間11年前 (2014/09/04 22:11)推噓67(67推 0噓 31→)留言98則, 34人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)
推 amovie: 看不出陳智弘比周思齊弱 09/04 22:07
周思齊 0.251/0.326/0.330
(對左投) 0.333/0.431/0.418
陳智弘 0.220/0.250/0.330
(對左投) 0.194/0.219/0.290
因為你看不出來,那只好直接貼數據。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.228.41.46
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Elephants/M.1409839906.A.717.html
推
09/04 22:12, , 1F
09/04 22:12, 1F
推
09/04 22:13, , 2F
09/04 22:13, 2F
推
09/04 22:13, , 3F
09/04 22:13, 3F
→
09/04 22:13, , 4F
09/04 22:13, 4F
光 OBP 有這樣的差距就該留在場上了,除非覺得這三分已追不回來。
→
09/04 22:13, , 5F
09/04 22:13, 5F
推
09/04 22:13, , 6F
09/04 22:13, 6F
→
09/04 22:14, , 7F
09/04 22:14, 7F
推
09/04 22:17, , 8F
09/04 22:17, 8F
→
09/04 22:17, , 9F
09/04 22:17, 9F
樣本看小不看大?
推
09/04 22:17, , 10F
09/04 22:17, 10F
推
09/04 22:17, , 11F
09/04 22:17, 11F
推
09/04 22:19, , 12F
09/04 22:19, 12F
推
09/04 22:20, , 13F
09/04 22:20, 13F
看近況,那應該要用張民諺啊!
推
09/04 22:21, , 14F
09/04 22:21, 14F
→
09/04 22:21, , 15F
09/04 22:21, 15F
→
09/04 22:21, , 16F
09/04 22:21, 16F
敢問你怎麼解釋張民諺?XDDDDDDDD
推
09/04 22:22, , 17F
09/04 22:22, 17F
→
09/04 22:25, , 18F
09/04 22:25, 18F
推
09/04 22:25, , 19F
09/04 22:25, 19F
→
09/04 22:26, , 20F
09/04 22:26, 20F
不敢,我只是拿你的邏輯回應你而已。
→
09/04 22:26, , 21F
09/04 22:26, 21F
推
09/04 22:26, , 22F
09/04 22:26, 22F
推
09/04 22:27, , 23F
09/04 22:27, 23F
→
09/04 22:27, , 24F
09/04 22:27, 24F
→
09/04 22:28, , 25F
09/04 22:28, 25F
揪眯。 ^_<*
※ 編輯: Sizemore24 (36.228.41.46), 09/04/2014 22:29:03
推
09/04 22:29, , 26F
09/04 22:29, 26F
推
09/04 22:30, , 27F
09/04 22:30, 27F
推
09/04 22:30, , 28F
09/04 22:30, 28F
→
09/04 22:31, , 29F
09/04 22:31, 29F
→
09/04 22:31, , 30F
09/04 22:31, 30F
推
09/04 22:32, , 31F
09/04 22:32, 31F
推
09/04 22:32, , 32F
09/04 22:32, 32F
推
09/04 22:32, , 33F
09/04 22:32, 33F
還有 28 則推文
→
09/04 22:43, , 62F
09/04 22:43, 62F
推
09/04 22:44, , 63F
09/04 22:44, 63F
推
09/04 22:46, , 64F
09/04 22:46, 64F
→
09/04 22:46, , 65F
09/04 22:46, 65F
→
09/04 22:49, , 66F
09/04 22:49, 66F
推
09/04 22:50, , 67F
09/04 22:50, 67F
某人一直在那近五場 ...
周董好歹近五場也凹到四次上壘機會,包含今天兩次,
是不怎樣,po 之前我也查過,但我會更看重那個左右 splits 成績。
在九上需要上壘者的前提下,我是教練還是會用他,
他就算再爛,跟陳智弘還是不同等級的打者,投手面對他的配球與心態也不一樣。
而且近況無敵的話,為什麼要放掉一個今天已上壘兩次的球員?
推
09/04 22:54, , 68F
09/04 22:54, 68F
→
09/04 22:55, , 69F
09/04 22:55, 69F
推
09/04 22:56, , 70F
09/04 22:56, 70F
呵呵,不跟你這個沒看 splits 的人說太多。
推
09/04 22:57, , 71F
09/04 22:57, 71F
→
09/04 22:57, , 72F
09/04 22:57, 72F
推
09/04 22:58, , 73F
09/04 22:58, 73F
推
09/04 22:58, , 74F
09/04 22:58, 74F
推
09/04 23:00, , 75F
09/04 23:00, 75F
推
09/04 23:02, , 76F
09/04 23:02, 76F
推
09/04 23:04, , 77F
09/04 23:04, 77F
推
09/04 23:06, , 78F
09/04 23:06, 78F
推
09/04 23:07, , 79F
09/04 23:07, 79F
推
09/04 23:10, , 80F
09/04 23:10, 80F
※ 編輯: Sizemore24 (36.228.41.46), 09/04/2014 23:11:35
推
09/04 23:17, , 81F
09/04 23:17, 81F
→
09/04 23:17, , 82F
09/04 23:17, 82F
推
09/04 23:20, , 83F
09/04 23:20, 83F
推
09/04 23:22, , 84F
09/04 23:22, 84F
推
09/04 23:40, , 85F
09/04 23:40, 85F
推
09/04 23:41, , 86F
09/04 23:41, 86F
推
09/04 23:51, , 87F
09/04 23:51, 87F
→
09/05 00:25, , 88F
09/05 00:25, 88F
推
09/05 01:39, , 89F
09/05 01:39, 89F
推
09/05 02:37, , 90F
09/05 02:37, 90F
→
09/05 02:38, , 91F
09/05 02:38, 91F
推
09/05 08:41, , 92F
09/05 08:41, 92F
推
09/05 11:47, , 93F
09/05 11:47, 93F
推
09/05 11:50, , 94F
09/05 11:50, 94F
推
09/05 12:04, , 95F
09/05 12:04, 95F
→
09/05 12:20, , 96F
09/05 12:20, 96F
→
08/11 23:13, , 97F
08/11 23:13, 97F
→
09/13 13:19, , 98F
09/13 13:19, 98F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):