Re: [假設]1948年中國共產黨將中國國民黨完全消滅
→ requiem: 怎麼老是有美國1950年以前放棄“臺灣”的說法。其實是放 06/03 20:30
→ requiem: 棄“蔣介石/國民黨控制的”臺灣 06/03 20:30
→ requiem: 1948的美國軍方報告可是肯定臺灣的戰略位置,但沒人懷疑 06/03 20:32
→ requiem: 國民黨抗共的決心和能力--因為不存在。 06/03 20:32
Cantel 3. As new arrival Taipei I am being given the "treatment" by Formosan
Independence "Movement"(台灣獨立運動). Conversations with Peter Huang and
Philip Ng and perusal of their propaganda have served only to establish their
utter lack of realism, absence of any militant and armed popular foundation,
and complete reliance on US to achieve their aims and
assure their livelihood forever.
(味其言觀其文,可知其昧於現實,無可戰之兵,復將自身理想及其生存全然寄望於美國
的援助之上。)
It seemed desirable to attempt to straighten out their thinking in relation
to China scene as to US, and to prevent misconception as to nature of any
personal relations with me.
In brief, they were told in friendly manner, as my personal opinion, that
Formosans themselves, unarmed, could not get rid of Chinese now on Island
(他們被委婉地告知:根據我個人的意見,福爾摩沙人在沒有自己的武裝基礎的狀況下,
無法擺脫中國政權掌控);
US would require several divisions of troops plus supporting naval and air
forces to take and keep control over Island, a responsibility which we are not
prepared to assume
(美國得生出幾個師的軍隊跟海空支援資源來掌控這個島,而美國不打算負這個責任);
for time being any hope for independence lay with Nationalists not with
Communi
sts, and thus measures designed weaken Nationalists merely served increase cha
nces Communist
control, so Formosans must recognize facts, not avoid them
(所以福爾摩沙人必須面對現實而不是逃避現實),
and they should not forget that Formosa fits intolarge pattern from which it
cannot be separated arbitrarily
(而且福爾摩沙人也不該忘記,福爾摩沙不能自以為可以獨自於世界之外運作);
and although US sympathetic to Formosan aspirations, there were very few
grounds for optimism now and foreseeable future.
by 1950.1 師樞安
看來某人的美國跟師樞安的講法是兩回事.
--
你比較喜歡哪一位?
1.平常相當不起眼,但被同年級男生想要捧紅的可愛高中女生.
2.跟同年級男生約會,但是中途那個男生就跑掉.平常雲淡風輕的不起眼女生開始發飆
3.跟同年紀男生一起逛同人場,結果幫男生的學妹而心情不爽的路人女生
4.在旁邊滑著手機冷眼旁觀看著同社團的人為了男人爭吵
5.別人在調侃是不是女友,義正嚴詞的說著"我是他的女主角"的高中女生
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.163.105.62
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DummyHistory/M.1464959516.A.49E.html
推
06/03 21:16, , 1F
06/03 21:16, 1F
→
06/03 21:17, , 2F
06/03 21:17, 2F
推
06/03 21:20, , 3F
06/03 21:20, 3F
→
06/03 21:46, , 4F
06/03 21:46, 4F
→
06/03 21:46, , 5F
06/03 21:46, 5F
→
06/03 21:47, , 6F
06/03 21:47, 6F
→
06/03 21:48, , 7F
06/03 21:48, 7F
→
06/03 21:48, , 8F
06/03 21:48, 8F
→
06/03 21:49, , 9F
06/03 21:49, 9F
→
06/03 21:50, , 10F
06/03 21:50, 10F
推
06/03 21:54, , 11F
06/03 21:54, 11F
→
06/03 21:57, , 12F
06/03 21:57, 12F
→
06/03 21:58, , 13F
06/03 21:58, 13F
→
06/03 21:58, , 14F
06/03 21:58, 14F
→
06/03 21:59, , 15F
06/03 21:59, 15F
→
06/03 21:59, , 16F
06/03 21:59, 16F
→
06/03 22:00, , 17F
06/03 22:00, 17F
→
06/03 22:05, , 18F
06/03 22:05, 18F
→
06/03 22:05, , 19F
06/03 22:05, 19F
→
06/03 22:09, , 20F
06/03 22:09, 20F
→
06/03 22:09, , 21F
06/03 22:09, 21F
→
06/03 22:09, , 22F
06/03 22:09, 22F
→
06/03 22:11, , 23F
06/03 22:11, 23F
→
06/03 22:12, , 24F
06/03 22:12, 24F
→
06/03 22:12, , 25F
06/03 22:12, 25F
→
06/03 22:13, , 26F
06/03 22:13, 26F
→
06/04 07:33, , 27F
06/04 07:33, 27F
推
06/04 08:36, , 28F
06/04 08:36, 28F
→
06/04 13:06, , 29F
06/04 13:06, 29F
→
06/04 13:07, , 30F
06/04 13:07, 30F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 17 篇):