Re: [空想] 隱藏結局─阿便與格大鬍的悲傷故事

看板DummyHistory作者 (加藤家的惠是我的!)時間9年前 (2015/01/06 11:17), 9年前編輯推噓3(3012)
留言15則, 7人參與, 最新討論串2/8 (看更多)

難到今天聯合報寫國務院出來澄清就是這隱藏版結局猜錯了
不過外國媒體是這樣報導的: The US State Department has said it was not given advance notice about a New Year's flag-raising ceremony at the residence of Taiwan's representative to Washington that has angered China. Taiwanese media report that it was the first time since Washington switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing 36 years ago that the flag of the Republic of China, as Taiwan is formally known, had been flown at the residence. In Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said yesterday that China had protested to the US about the January 1 ceremony and requested Washington "act with discretion when dealing with Taiwan-related issues." In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the ceremony at the Twin Oaks residence was not consistent with US policy, and no US government personnel attended. She said "nothing has changed" in the status of the US-Taiwanese relationship, and the US remains committed to the one China policy. Under that policy, the US recognises Beijing as representing China. Taiwan split from the Chinese mainland amid civil war in 1949, and China regards Taiwan, a self- governing island, as part of its territory. The US policy acknowledges the Chinese view over sovereignty, but considers Taiwan's status as unsettled. This delicate compromise makes the Taiwan's diplomatic presence in Washington an area of some sensitivity despite an easing of tensions across the Taiwan Strait in recent years. Twin Oaks was the residence of Republic of China ambassadors from 1937 until 1979, when the US shifted its diplomatic recognition to Beijing. The Taipei Times newspaper cited the Taiwanese representative to the US, Shen Lyu-shun, as saying his office had notified the Obama administration before Thursday's ceremony and received US approval provided the ceremony was low-profile and not televised. The Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in Washington, as Taiwan's mission is known, declined to comment yesterday, referring questions to the Foreign Ministry in Taipei Flag-raising by Taiwan in Washington riles China http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/flag-raising-by-taiwan- in-washington-riles-china-115010600076_1.html -- 我個人是用google翻譯來看,從google翻譯我是看不到聯合報的講法.. P.S.前一天中國外交部有跑去美國抗議這件事情. -- 你比較喜歡哪一位? 1.平常相當不起眼,但被同年級男生想要捧紅的可愛高中女生. 2.跟同年級男生約會,但是中途那個男生就跑掉.平常雲淡風輕的不起眼女生開始發飆 3.跟同年紀男生一起逛同人場,結果幫男生的學妹而心情不爽的路人女生 4.在旁邊滑著手機冷眼旁觀看著同社團的人為了男人爭吵 5.別人在調侃是不是女友,義正嚴詞的說著"我是他的女主角"的高中女生 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.164.83.5 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DummyHistory/M.1420514245.A.EB7.html ※ 編輯: godivan (1.164.83.5), 01/06/2015 11:27:25

01/06 11:40, , 1F
聯合報標題寫抨擊有點奇怪,不過內容不算有大錯呀。
01/06 11:40, 1F

01/06 11:42, , 2F
簡單來說就是〝我事前不知,他們自己搞的,這不符我國政
01/06 11:42, 2F

01/06 11:42, , 3F
策〞
01/06 11:42, 3F

01/06 11:43, , 4F
也可以解釋成為他們裝傻到底啦。
01/06 11:43, 4F
裝傻的可能性有點高 中央社是這樣報導 雙橡園升旗 美國務院:台美關係不變 http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/201501060068-1.aspx 中央社記者鄭崇生華盛頓5日專電)美國國務院發言人莎琪今天說,雙橡園日前舉行中華 民國升旗典禮與美國政策不一致,但她也強調,台美關係沒有因此而改變。 中華民國駐美代表處元旦時於雙橡園(Twin Oaks)舉行升旗典禮,中華民國國旗睽違36 年後飄揚華府,國旗由兩位駐美海軍軍官護送入場,中華民國駐美軍事代表團全體成員身 著戎裝參加典禮。 對此,莎琪(Jen Psaki)今天在例行記者會上表示,美國事先不知情,儀式與美國政策 不一致,美國繼續恪守以「三個公報」及「台灣關係法」為基礎的美國「一中政策」。沒 有美國官員以任何身分出席。 記者追問這項升旗儀式是否意謂台美雙邊關係更為堅強,莎琪強調,台美間的互信及關係 並沒有因此改變。 大陸外交部發言人華春瑩5日在北京的例行記者會上回應提問表示,堅決反對台灣舉行升 旗儀式,並已向美方嚴正交涉。 她還說,大陸要求美方恪守「一個中國」政策和中美三個聯合公報原則,慎重妥善處理涉 台問題。 至於美方是否已收到中方抗議,莎琪僅表示,沒有進一步的訊息提供,應由中國方面回答 。1040106 ※ 編輯: godivan (1.164.83.5), 01/06/2015 11:51:16

01/06 11:50, , 5F
哪方決策?哪方申請? 會知了誰? 什麼時候醞釀? 為了什麼? 造
01/06 11:50, 5F

01/06 11:51, , 6F
成何種影響? 好奇XD
01/06 11:51, 6F

01/06 12:07, , 7F
明顯裝傻
01/06 12:07, 7F

01/06 12:15, , 8F
"nothing has changed" 1.裝傻 2.黑白臉
01/06 12:15, 8F

01/06 12:17, , 9F
就一個報導各自解讀 到底裝傻還是認真都有可能
01/06 12:17, 9F

01/06 12:17, , 10F
美國國務院一直都是中国優先會跳出來打臉也不奇怪
01/06 12:17, 10F

01/06 12:41, , 11F
美國人以後一定多多升旗,一升旗就有人朝美國叩謝天恩,太廉
01/06 12:41, 11F

01/06 12:41, , 12F
價啦,多多益善
01/06 12:41, 12F

01/06 12:43, , 13F
哈 怎不會有人認為是"出外景"跑到美國去出的媒體治國術呢XD
01/06 12:43, 13F

01/06 13:57, , 14F
別把中美情報單位當死人…
01/06 13:57, 14F

01/06 14:05, , 15F
"會知了誰?"這問題的答案可以解決fred你的評論 btw我沒正解
01/06 14:05, 15F
文章代碼(AID): #1KgrF5wt (DummyHistory)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1KgrF5wt (DummyHistory)