Re: [假設] 朱元璋、努兒哈赤、毛澤東,誰的軍事才 …
討論了這么多帖子,居然沒一個帖子沒有一句話提到老毛發了半輩子的海量電報。
老蔣寫了一輩子日記,要重新解讀光頭自然要從日記著手;
老毛發了一輩子電報,要了解老毛的軍事水平自然要從電報著手。
版上丫丫嗚嗚說了一大堆老毛靠日本人靠蘇聯靠林粟,有几個看過老毛電報的?
別回一句那些電報都是共匪偽造的...
老毛比老蔣還喜歡寫東西,把他這輩子寫的關于軍事的文字都看完了,基本也就
知道這人水平怎樣。不過估計版上能做到這點的10個還出不了一個,看看上面的帖
子,全是抱著“不是老蔣太愚蠢,而是老毛太好命”的心態。不去了解敵方統帥,
難怪當年輸的脫褲子...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.224.170.8
推
12/14 20:37, , 1F
12/14 20:37, 1F
推
12/14 20:40, , 2F
12/14 20:40, 2F
推
12/14 20:41, , 3F
12/14 20:41, 3F
412,5次圍剿江西蘇區,ccp被殺的10停還不到1停,歷史上可有這种山窮水盡
情況下還能逆轉胜的農民領袖么
推
12/14 20:43, , 4F
12/14 20:43, 4F
→
12/14 20:44, , 5F
12/14 20:44, 5F
→
12/14 20:47, , 6F
12/14 20:47, 6F
→
12/14 20:49, , 7F
12/14 20:49, 7F
那是黑格爾->馬克思->老毛的所謂唯物主義辯証法,關于前線的戰報哪會這樣
推
12/14 20:50, , 8F
12/14 20:50, 8F
老毛的詩詞就是充斥著"王霸之气",最适合拿來YY
推
12/14 20:51, , 9F
12/14 20:51, 9F
→
12/14 20:51, , 10F
12/14 20:51, 10F
→
12/14 20:52, , 11F
12/14 20:52, 11F
→
12/14 20:53, , 12F
12/14 20:53, 12F
推
12/14 20:57, , 13F
12/14 20:57, 13F
→
12/14 21:01, , 14F
12/14 21:01, 14F
→
12/14 21:09, , 15F
12/14 21:09, 15F
→
12/14 21:15, , 16F
12/14 21:15, 16F
→
12/14 21:32, , 17F
12/14 21:32, 17F
※ 編輯: VegetablBird 來自: 220.191.38.179 (12/14 22:11)
推
12/14 22:29, , 18F
12/14 22:29, 18F
推
12/14 22:39, , 19F
12/14 22:39, 19F
推
12/15 00:02, , 20F
12/15 00:02, 20F
→
12/15 00:03, , 21F
12/15 00:03, 21F
推
12/15 00:04, , 22F
12/15 00:04, 22F
→
12/15 00:06, , 23F
12/15 00:06, 23F
→
12/15 00:21, , 24F
12/15 00:21, 24F
→
12/15 00:22, , 25F
12/15 00:22, 25F
→
12/15 00:24, , 26F
12/15 00:24, 26F
→
12/15 00:26, , 27F
12/15 00:26, 27F
→
12/15 00:32, , 28F
12/15 00:32, 28F
→
12/15 00:36, , 29F
12/15 00:36, 29F
推
12/15 01:31, , 30F
12/15 01:31, 30F
推
12/15 07:28, , 31F
12/15 07:28, 31F
→
12/15 10:12, , 32F
12/15 10:12, 32F
→
12/15 18:39, , 33F
12/15 18:39, 33F
推
12/15 21:14, , 34F
12/15 21:14, 34F
→
12/15 21:15, , 35F
12/15 21:15, 35F
→
12/15 21:16, , 36F
12/15 21:16, 36F
→
12/15 21:17, , 37F
12/15 21:17, 37F
→
12/15 21:18, , 38F
12/15 21:18, 38F
→
12/15 21:19, , 39F
12/15 21:19, 39F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 11 之 20 篇):