[問題] 請問甲狀腺結節一定要照CT嘛??
因為喉嚨痛很久 意外發現脖子上有多一塊腫瘤
診所叫我到大醫院檢查
所以我到高醫掛耳鼻喉科
結果醫生摸了摸說是甲狀腺長東西
就排了快二個月後檢查
但是因為我長東西 不知是良性還是惡性
簡直坐立難安
剛好看到新聞說大林慈濟有開甲狀腺特別門診 可以當天抽細胞檢查
所以我就特別坐車到大林求醫
醫師很有耐心、很親切用超音波及用針抽取檢查
結果說是良性的 甲狀腺功能正常
雖然是4公分大 醫師是講沒其他壓迫性症狀 追蹤就可以了 不用開刀
喉嚨痛跟甲狀腺無關
(但是喉嚨一直痛 只好再找別的耳鼻喉科用鼻咽鏡檢查 醫師講可能是胃食道逆流造成 )
但高醫原來排的檢查時間快到了
我那時有問醫師說高醫的檢查還要做嘛??
醫師是講還是可以做 因為每個醫師下針的位置不一樣
我後來想想還是再一次檢查好了 比較安心
但是高醫這邊檢查還多排了電腦斷層
查了一下 電腦斷層的幅射劑量非常高
這樣照甲狀腺(又已經長結節了)真的安全嘛??會不會原來良性變惡性的呀??
>"< 請問我可以跟醫師要求說用核磁共振代替嘛??
還是其實超音波跟針刺及抽血等檢查就夠了呢??(因為大林慈濟也沒做CT)
真的很害怕又猶豫
盼請解答
謝謝大家
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.173.88.135
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Doctor-Info/M.1504342406.A.A15.html
推
09/02 17:16, , 1F
09/02 17:16, 1F
推
09/02 17:31, , 2F
09/02 17:31, 2F
推
09/02 18:07, , 3F
09/02 18:07, 3F
推
09/02 18:43, , 4F
09/02 18:43, 4F
→
09/02 18:43, , 5F
09/02 18:43, 5F
→
09/02 18:43, , 6F
09/02 18:43, 6F
→
09/02 18:50, , 7F
09/02 18:50, 7F
→
09/02 18:51, , 8F
09/02 18:51, 8F
→
09/02 18:52, , 9F
09/02 18:52, 9F
→
09/02 18:53, , 10F
09/02 18:53, 10F
→
09/02 18:54, , 11F
09/02 18:54, 11F
→
09/02 18:55, , 12F
09/02 18:55, 12F
推
09/02 19:20, , 13F
09/02 19:20, 13F
→
09/02 19:20, , 14F
09/02 19:20, 14F
→
09/02 19:20, , 15F
09/02 19:20, 15F
→
09/02 19:20, , 16F
09/02 19:20, 16F
→
09/02 19:20, , 17F
09/02 19:20, 17F
→
09/02 19:20, , 18F
09/02 19:20, 18F
→
09/02 19:21, , 19F
09/02 19:21, 19F
→
09/02 19:21, , 20F
09/02 19:21, 20F
→
09/02 19:34, , 21F
09/02 19:34, 21F
→
09/02 19:35, , 22F
09/02 19:35, 22F
→
09/02 19:36, , 23F
09/02 19:36, 23F
→
09/02 19:36, , 24F
09/02 19:36, 24F
→
09/02 19:37, , 25F
09/02 19:37, 25F
→
09/02 19:37, , 26F
09/02 19:37, 26F
→
09/02 19:38, , 27F
09/02 19:38, 27F
→
09/02 19:39, , 28F
09/02 19:39, 28F
→
09/02 19:40, , 29F
09/02 19:40, 29F
→
09/02 19:41, , 30F
09/02 19:41, 30F
→
09/02 19:42, , 31F
09/02 19:42, 31F
→
09/02 19:43, , 32F
09/02 19:43, 32F
→
09/02 19:44, , 33F
09/02 19:44, 33F
→
09/02 19:46, , 34F
09/02 19:46, 34F
推
09/02 20:08, , 35F
09/02 20:08, 35F
→
09/02 20:08, , 36F
09/02 20:08, 36F
→
09/02 20:08, , 37F
09/02 20:08, 37F
→
09/02 20:08, , 38F
09/02 20:08, 38F
→
09/02 20:48, , 39F
09/02 20:48, 39F
→
09/02 20:48, , 40F
09/02 20:48, 40F
→
09/02 20:49, , 41F
09/02 20:49, 41F
→
09/02 20:50, , 42F
09/02 20:50, 42F
→
09/02 20:51, , 43F
09/02 20:51, 43F
→
09/02 20:52, , 44F
09/02 20:52, 44F
→
09/02 20:54, , 45F
09/02 20:54, 45F
→
09/02 20:55, , 46F
09/02 20:55, 46F
→
09/02 20:55, , 47F
09/02 20:55, 47F
→
09/02 20:56, , 48F
09/02 20:56, 48F
→
09/02 21:01, , 49F
09/02 21:01, 49F
推
09/02 22:11, , 50F
09/02 22:11, 50F
→
09/02 22:11, , 51F
09/02 22:11, 51F
→
09/02 22:11, , 52F
09/02 22:11, 52F
推
09/02 22:14, , 53F
09/02 22:14, 53F
→
09/02 22:14, , 54F
09/02 22:14, 54F
→
09/02 22:14, , 55F
09/02 22:14, 55F
→
09/02 22:17, , 56F
09/02 22:17, 56F
→
09/02 22:18, , 57F
09/02 22:18, 57F
→
09/02 22:19, , 58F
09/02 22:19, 58F
→
09/02 22:20, , 59F
09/02 22:20, 59F
→
09/02 22:20, , 60F
09/02 22:20, 60F
→
09/02 22:22, , 61F
09/02 22:22, 61F
→
09/02 22:24, , 62F
09/02 22:24, 62F
→
09/02 22:27, , 63F
09/02 22:27, 63F
推
09/02 23:56, , 64F
09/02 23:56, 64F
→
09/02 23:56, , 65F
09/02 23:56, 65F
→
09/02 23:56, , 66F
09/02 23:56, 66F
→
09/02 23:56, , 67F
09/02 23:56, 67F
→
09/02 23:56, , 68F
09/02 23:56, 68F
→
09/03 00:36, , 69F
09/03 00:36, 69F
→
09/03 00:39, , 70F
09/03 00:39, 70F
→
09/03 00:40, , 71F
09/03 00:40, 71F
→
09/03 00:41, , 72F
09/03 00:41, 72F
→
09/03 00:42, , 73F
09/03 00:42, 73F
→
09/03 00:43, , 74F
09/03 00:43, 74F
→
09/03 00:44, , 75F
09/03 00:44, 75F
→
09/03 00:46, , 76F
09/03 00:46, 76F
推
09/04 07:59, , 77F
09/04 07:59, 77F
→
09/04 07:59, , 78F
09/04 07:59, 78F
→
09/04 07:59, , 79F
09/04 07:59, 79F
→
09/04 07:59, , 80F
09/04 07:59, 80F
→
09/04 07:59, , 81F
09/04 07:59, 81F
推
09/04 08:29, , 82F
09/04 08:29, 82F
→
09/04 08:29, , 83F
09/04 08:29, 83F
→
09/04 18:24, , 84F
09/04 18:24, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):