Fw: [問卦] 有沒有婚紗攝影檔案的八卦 ?
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1Jc5BkmH ]
作者: wintek2 (edw) 看板: Gossiping
標題: [問卦] 有沒有婚紗攝影檔案的八卦 ?
時間: Wed Jun 11 21:00:20 2014
有沒有婚紗攝影檔案的八卦 ?
小妹到台北市知名的一家婚紗拍照
52張照片花了 6萬8千多元
平均一張照片 1323 台幣
昨天拿到攝影師的 "相機內原始檔"(就有買的那52張啦)
靠要 , 800萬畫素 JPG , 每張 1.8MB ~ 2.3MB
旰我手機拍的檔案都比你大 (我手機1300萬畫素每張4~5MB).
雖然該鎮店攝影師用 卡農 1D系列 (1800萬畫素)
有必要這麼寒酸嗎 ? 調成800萬拍,記憶卡不夠小妹送你一張阿 .
阿那個 RAW 檔都是誰在用阿 ?? 婚紗都不用了難道都業餘單眼宅在用嗎 ?
我有特地問了,她說本店都採 JPG 直接拍攝 .
想當年 底片時代 婚紗必定使用中片幅相機
大多採用 67 (底片6公分x7公分),再爛的店也採 645 (底片6公分x4.5公分)
你買的照片會給你底片.
2014年 800萬 1.8MB JPG
有沒有婚紗攝影檔案的八卦 ? ?????
--
美少女外拍就是白天拍的正妹 .
晚上你在修圖PO圖時她正在別人床上大戰 .
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.240.109.234
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1402491630.A.C11.html
→
06/11 21:01, , 1F
06/11 21:01, 1F
噓
06/11 21:02, , 2F
06/11 21:02, 2F
→
06/11 21:02, , 3F
06/11 21:02, 3F
→
06/11 21:03, , 4F
06/11 21:03, 4F
→
06/11 21:03, , 5F
06/11 21:03, 5F
推
06/11 21:03, , 6F
06/11 21:03, 6F
推
06/11 21:04, , 7F
06/11 21:04, 7F
推
06/11 21:06, , 8F
06/11 21:06, 8F
絕對不是術語,因為修圖人員就拿那個800萬1.8MB JPG當場修給我看
依我的要求調整修圖,修完直接送印刷店
→
06/11 21:07, , 9F
06/11 21:07, 9F
※ 轉錄者: wintek2 (111.240.109.234), 06/11/2014 21:11:43
→
06/11 21:20, , 10F
06/11 21:20, 10F
當然含禮服造型阿
推
06/11 21:24, , 11F
06/11 21:24, 11F
具該名店人員是跟我說:婚紗業都用 JPG
→
06/11 21:38, , 12F
06/11 21:38, 12F
推
06/11 21:38, , 13F
06/11 21:38, 13F
→
06/11 21:38, , 14F
06/11 21:38, 14F
→
06/11 21:39, , 15F
06/11 21:39, 15F
→
06/11 21:39, , 16F
06/11 21:39, 16F
推
06/11 21:41, , 17F
06/11 21:41, 17F
你哪裡看到 7萬8 ? 小妹窮 所以不便宜阿
推
06/11 21:44, , 18F
06/11 21:44, 18F
推
06/11 21:45, , 19F
06/11 21:45, 19F
→
06/11 21:45, , 20F
06/11 21:45, 20F
→
06/11 21:51, , 21F
06/11 21:51, 21F
推
06/11 21:53, , 22F
06/11 21:53, 22F
業餘玩家規格錙銖必較,婚紗動輒7~8萬,800萬1.8MB JPG
推
06/11 22:02, , 23F
06/11 22:02, 23F
推
06/11 22:02, , 24F
06/11 22:02, 24F
1Dx
推
06/11 22:07, , 25F
06/11 22:07, 25F
→
06/11 22:07, , 26F
06/11 22:07, 26F
推
06/11 22:08, , 27F
06/11 22:08, 27F
→
06/11 22:13, , 28F
06/11 22:13, 28F
→
06/11 22:14, , 29F
06/11 22:14, 29F
→
06/11 22:14, , 30F
06/11 22:14, 30F
→
06/11 22:15, , 31F
06/11 22:15, 31F
→
06/11 22:15, , 32F
06/11 22:15, 32F
還有 45 則推文
還有 7 段內文
→
06/12 02:34, , 78F
06/12 02:34, 78F
→
06/12 02:35, , 79F
06/12 02:35, 79F
推
06/12 02:39, , 80F
06/12 02:39, 80F
→
06/12 02:39, , 81F
06/12 02:39, 81F
推
06/12 03:49, , 82F
06/12 03:49, 82F
→
06/12 03:50, , 83F
06/12 03:50, 83F
→
06/12 03:50, , 84F
06/12 03:50, 84F
推
06/12 06:41, , 85F
06/12 06:41, 85F
→
06/12 06:43, , 86F
06/12 06:43, 86F
推
06/12 09:17, , 87F
06/12 09:17, 87F
→
06/12 09:18, , 88F
06/12 09:18, 88F
推
06/12 09:26, , 89F
06/12 09:26, 89F
推
06/12 09:46, , 90F
06/12 09:46, 90F
推
06/12 10:08, , 91F
06/12 10:08, 91F
推
06/12 10:16, , 92F
06/12 10:16, 92F
→
06/12 10:39, , 93F
06/12 10:39, 93F
→
06/12 10:39, , 94F
06/12 10:39, 94F
噓
06/12 10:40, , 95F
06/12 10:40, 95F
→
06/12 10:40, , 96F
06/12 10:40, 96F
→
06/12 10:42, , 97F
06/12 10:42, 97F
推
06/12 10:43, , 98F
06/12 10:43, 98F
→
06/12 10:44, , 99F
06/12 10:44, 99F
→
06/12 10:44, , 100F
06/12 10:44, 100F
→
06/12 10:44, , 101F
06/12 10:44, 101F
→
06/12 10:44, , 102F
06/12 10:44, 102F
→
06/12 10:44, , 103F
06/12 10:44, 103F
→
06/12 10:44, , 104F
06/12 10:44, 104F
→
06/12 10:44, , 105F
06/12 10:44, 105F
→
06/12 10:44, , 106F
06/12 10:44, 106F
推
06/12 10:45, , 107F
06/12 10:45, 107F
推
06/12 11:42, , 108F
06/12 11:42, 108F
→
06/12 14:13, , 109F
06/12 14:13, 109F
噓
06/12 17:16, , 110F
06/12 17:16, 110F
→
06/15 17:10, , 111F
06/15 17:10, 111F
噓
06/16 19:01, , 112F
06/16 19:01, 112F
推
06/23 18:50, , 113F
06/23 18:50, 113F
推
06/23 18:51, , 114F
06/23 18:51, 114F
→
06/23 18:51, , 115F
06/23 18:51, 115F
→
06/24 15:23, , 116F
06/24 15:23, 116F
→
06/24 15:23, , 117F
06/24 15:23, 117F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):