[情報] Nikon D800 tested at DxOMark, gets the

看板DSLR作者 (四郎)時間12年前 (2012/03/24 00:50), 編輯推噓27(27推 0噓 24→)
留言51則, 29人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
http://nikonrumors.com/2012/03/23/nikon-d800-gets-tested-at-dxomark-gets-the-1-spot.aspx/ http://tinyurl.com/88pqydp Nikon D800 tested at DxOMark, gets the #1 spot By [NR] ADMIN | Published: MARCH 23, 2012 After the Nikon D4 got the second best DxOMark overal score on Tuesday, today there is a new king - the Nikon D800 is now the #1 rated camera - it even got a higher score than the Phase One IQ180 digital back. The detailed stats are available on DxoMark, here are few screenshots: http://nikonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Nikon-D800-top-rating-DxOMark.png
http://tinyurl.com/7x64hau http://nikonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Nikon-D800-DxoMark-test.png
-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 129.89.95.70
推
03/24 00:53, , 1F
真令人驚訝，D800的高iso如此強悍
03/24 00:53, 1F
→
03/24 00:56, , 2F
5d3還沒測,真令人期待
03/24 00:56, 2F
→
03/24 00:58, , 3F
扯的是D800畫素密度還這麼高，表示APSC 1600萬畫素也可以這樣
03/24 00:58, 3F
推
03/24 01:08, , 4F
重點是動態範圍!!
03/24 01:08, 4F
推
03/24 01:09, , 5F
簡而言之,就是 破表 了
03/24 01:09, 5F
→
03/24 01:12, , 6F
Nikon的機子有誠意、Sensor又好，到底為什麼會賣輸C?
03/24 01:12, 6F
→
03/24 01:13, , 7F
早期EF鏡頭就綁定了太多用家,G鏡發展的太晚
03/24 01:13, 7F
→
03/24 01:16, , 8F
產能線太小了...常常缺貨...Nikon要想辨法解決這問題
03/24 01:16, 8F
→
03/24 01:23, , 9F
神機k5輸了
03/24 01:23, 9F
→
03/24 01:26, , 10F
太多資源在泰國..對Nikon也很傷..
03/24 01:26, 10F
→
03/24 01:26, , 11F
K-5不知不覺要變老機了...
03/24 01:26, 11F
推
03/24 01:34, , 12F
不是規格好就一定賣得好…
03/24 01:34, 12F
推
03/24 01:43, , 13F
因為Canon是生意人，Nikon是老實人 (逃)
03/24 01:43, 13F
→
03/24 01:44, , 14F
Dx0不意外
03/24 01:44, 14F
推
03/24 01:47, , 15F
http://tinyurl.com/73vyhxf 5D3 ISO表現其實跟5D2差不
03/24 01:47, 15F
→
03/24 01:48, , 16F
多,在DXO這個網站上一定會把真相還原,恐怕分數還是不會
03/24 01:48, 16F
→
03/24 01:48, , 17F
太好
03/24 01:48, 17F
推
03/24 02:16, , 18F
只能說SONY的sensor在N、P兩家調教下真的很變態
03/24 02:16, 18F
推
03/24 02:24, , 19F
整體分數連Phase One都輸給D800....
03/24 02:24, 19F
→
03/24 04:54, , 20F
要價1400K的Phase One都輸D800 XD CP值高到爆表(?
03/24 04:54, 20F
推
03/24 04:56, , 21F
D4輸D800？那我預購D4情何以堪…
03/24 04:56, 21F
推
03/24 07:28, , 22F
好強！心動拉～～～
03/24 07:28, 22F
推
03/24 08:45, , 23F
新一代戰神?
03/24 08:45, 23F
推
03/24 09:21, , 24F
可惡 沒錢
03/24 09:21, 24F
推
03/24 10:07, , 25F
好像他們是把畫素都運算降到8Mp 這樣D800的色彩深度
03/24 10:07, 25F
→
03/24 10:08, , 26F
還有雜訊、細節都會變得很優良
03/24 10:08, 26F
推
03/24 10:36, , 27F
數據跟實際感受似乎有點差距...
03/24 10:36, 27F
推
03/24 10:51, , 28F
拍得好看就好了
03/24 10:51, 28F
推
03/24 11:11, , 29F
DxO給Nikon的分數本來都偏高，沒什麼參考價值
03/24 11:11, 29F
推
03/24 11:25, , 30F
偏高是因為DxO偏好Nikon嗎? 怎會沒參考價值?
03/24 11:25, 30F
推
03/24 11:47, , 31F
前15名有8個是Nikon的，你覺得呢
03/24 11:47, 31F
推
03/24 11:50, , 32F
我的意思是 也沒有別家的測試 有不一樣的結果
03/24 11:50, 32F
推
03/24 11:53, , 33F
要說沒參考價值 要有另外一個有參考價值的對照組
03/24 11:53, 33F
推
03/24 11:58, , 34F
前15名有8個就8個阿 但是到底是DxO偏心 還是nikon真的
03/24 11:58, 34F
→
03/24 11:59, , 35F
在這些DxO測試標準下分數比較高 總得有個比較說明
03/24 11:59, 35F
→
03/24 12:02, , 36F
雖然我也覺得d800>d4 的 Dynamic Range 不合理
03/24 12:02, 36F
→
03/24 12:02, , 37F
但是也只是"我覺得"
03/24 12:02, 37F
推
03/24 14:24, , 38F
光憑前15名有8個是Nikon就說沒參考價值，這種說法才是最沒
03/24 14:24, 38F
→
03/24 14:25, , 39F
參考價值的。
03/24 14:25, 39F
→
03/24 14:48, , 40F
前15名有8個是Nikon，表示N家機子做的真的很好，眾所周知
03/24 14:48, 40F
→
03/24 14:49, , 41F
Nikon機子耐用，可靠，功能強，本來就是大家公認的
03/24 14:49, 41F
→
03/24 15:15, , 42F
這網站是在測sensor的吧
03/24 15:15, 42F
推
03/24 16:34, , 43F
如果是縮圖到8MP再來比的話，D800高畫素的確有些優勢
03/24 16:34, 43F
→
03/24 16:35, , 44F
但是當初7D的18mp分數還是輸12mp的D90 所以D800還是很猛.
03/24 16:35, 44F
→
03/24 18:09, , 45F
Dx0網站有Nikon廣告，沒有C的，所以......
03/24 18:09, 45F
推
03/24 21:30, , 46F
DXO只有自家修圖軟件的廣告吧,再之前的是GOOGLE廣告
03/24 21:30, 46F
→
03/25 01:16, , 47F
滴差歐是個有能力用高科技精密儀器測試sesor的賣軟體商XD
03/25 01:16, 47F
推
03/25 01:17, , 48F
光憑前15名有8個是Nikon就說沒參考價值，這種說法才
03/25 01:17, 48F
→
03/25 01:18, , 49F
是最沒有參考價值的。
03/25 01:18, 49F
推
03/25 14:53, , 50F
03/25 14:53, 50F
推
03/25 23:39, , 51F
這影片拍的真好
03/25 23:39, 51F
‣ 更多 sharpshoot 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1FRAdiv3 (DSLR)
‣ 更多 sharpshoot 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1FRAdiv3 (DSLR)