Re: three kernel patches for review

看板DFBSD_submit作者時間20年前 (2005/04/23 03:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串12/13 (看更多)
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote: > memtest won't necessarily find the problem(s). If a memory > problem isn't due to a stuck bit (and most aren't), then it will > depend on a billion factors that no memory testing program can > ever test reliably. The only solution to bad memory is usually to > replace the stick or replace the computer. Sometimes you can > de-tune a computer (e.g. slow down the FSB, and a clock to the RAS > and CAS cycles, etc) to fix marginal memory. > > Another poster noted that the BIOS might report memory where there > is actually I/O. This is a reasonable basis for putting in *some* > sort of hack but I don't think that the VM page lists are the > right place for that sort of thing. OK. Can I at least add an ASSERT_IN_CRIT_SECTION() to vm_add_new_page() for now? (It had nothing to do with the bad RAM thing, it was just something I noticed in the comment...) -Chris
文章代碼(AID): #12QKdv00 (DFBSD_submit)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #12QKdv00 (DFBSD_submit)