Re: three kernel patches for review
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:48:02PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> On #3 ... that doesn't look so reasonable. I suppose on a machine with
> huge amounts of memory one might want such a mechanism, but frankly if
> memory is bad (especially if it is ECC'd memory), the only correct
> solution is to replace it.
>
> So I would say 'no' on the badram patch, at least for now.
I'm also split on the badram patch. I have some RAM modules which have
static bad bits, so they could be used with the bad ram patch. On the
other hand, such modules should be replaced and burned :)
Joerg
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 13 篇)：