Re: three kernel patches for review
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> On #3 ... that doesn't look so reasonable. I suppose on a machine with
> huge amounts of memory one might want such a mechanism, but frankly if
> memory is bad (especially if it is ECC'd memory), the only correct
> solution is to replace it.
>
> So I would say 'no' on the badram patch, at least for now.
>
I don't think it is only for bad ram. :-)
some BIOS is bad enough that a space is I/O space but it lies that
it is ram and could be used, too bad.
> -Matt
> Matthew Dillon
> <dillon@backplane.com>
Cheers,
David Xu
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 13 篇)：