Re: HEADS UP: BIND Removal. Short instructions for migration to
On Sun, April 11, 2010 3:50 pm, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
> Doing away with named(8) in base is okay with me, but removing the other
> tools that are part of bind (namely host(1) and dig(1)) isn't. They're
> too useful and too common not to be expected in a base system.
Don't a number of Linux systems ship without those tools unless added via
a separate package? I know, I know - "it's that way in Linux" isn't
necessarily a compelling reason.
If this causes a problem, we could add BIND from pkgsrc as part of the
install. I'd like to see more stuff done that way, really.
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 11 篇)：