Re: HEADS UP: BIND Removal. Short instructions for migration to

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間16年前 (2010/04/12 04:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/11 (看更多)
Thomas E. Spanjaard schrieb: > Doing away with named(8) in base is okay with me, but removing the other > tools that are part of bind (namely host(1) and dig(1)) isn't. They're > too useful and too common not to be expected in a base system. > That is why drill is coming in. Problem is you can't really dump BIND without dumping the related tools, too. AFAICT they are too glued together, don't know how to say it. If you keep the parts of BIND in base that you need for the tools like host and dig there is not much difference in keeping the entire BIND distribution in base. Jan -- professional: http://www.oscar-consult.de private: http://neslonek.homeunix.org/drupal/
文章代碼(AID): #1BmZ77HO (DFBSD_kernel)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 11 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1BmZ77HO (DFBSD_kernel)