Re: kernel leaking memory somewhere

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間16年前 (2009/12/17 06:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串9/15 (看更多)
Hi guys, This is TOP output on FBSD 7 box that runs the same software as the DF box. Actually the FBSD box also runs MySQL and Ruby on Rails! last pid: 60325; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 57+13:36:12 08:11:43 79 processes: 1 running, 78 sleeping CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.9% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.1% idle Mem: 294M Active, 1906M Inact, 401M Wired, 30M Cache, 399M Buf, 1314M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 16K Used, 4096M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 669 root 1 44 0 119M 99M select 1 382:26 0.00% snmpd 844 nobody 1 4 0 7796K 2260K kqread 0 1:59 0.00% memcached 941 root 1 44 0 22880K 2840K select 3 1:44 0.00% sshd 543 root 1 44 0 5692K 1172K select 2 0:26 0.00% syslogd 817 root 1 4 0 5808K 1420K kqread 0 0:16 0.00% master 85668 pgsql 1 44 0 1027M 52340K select 2 0:16 0.00% postgres 948 root 1 8 0 6748K 1200K nanslp 1 0:15 0.00% cron 85671 pgsql 1 44 0 22576K 5784K select 1 0:13 0.00% postgres 825 postfix 1 4 0 5808K 1544K kqread 2 0:11 0.00% qmgr 85669 pgsql 1 44 0 1027M 6972K select 2 0:09 0.00% postgres 85666 pgsql 1 44 0 1027M 5892K select 2 0:08 0.00% postgres 85670 pgsql 1 44 0 1028M 6132K select 2 0:07 0.00% postgres 42312 www 1 20 0 143M 19380K lockf 0 0:02 0.00% httpd 44595 www 1 20 0 143M 19320K lockf 1 0:02 0.00% httpd 42299 root 1 44 0 141M 16304K select 0 0:02 0.00% httpd 899 mysql 9 20 0 61608K 26156K sigwai 2 0:01 0.00% mysqld 612 bind 7 4 0 21420K 14620K kqread 1 0:01 0.00% named 42914 www 1 20 0 143M 19236K lockf 0 0:01 0.00% httpd 42313 www 1 20 0 143M 19240K lockf 1 0:01 0.00% httpd 45188 www 1 20 0 143M 19236K lockf 2 0:01 0.00% httpd 44007 www 1 20 0 143M 19172K lockf 0 0:00 0.00% httpd 41418 sysadmin 1 44 0 33772K 3836K select 2 0:00 0.00% sshd 45711 www 1 20 0 141M 16800K lockf 0 0:00 0.00% httpd 41426 root 1 5 0 10108K 2588K ttyin 0 0:00 0.00% csh 45712 www 1 4 0 141M 16824K kqread 0 0:00 0.00% httpd 48958 www 1 20 0 141M 16808K lockf 3 0:00 0.00% httpd 45966 www 1 20 0 141M 16784K lockf 1 0:00 0.00% httpd 60230 root 1 4 0 33772K 3876K sbwait 0 0:00 0.00% sshd 41415 root 1 4 0 33772K 3848K sbwait 2 0:00 0.00% sshd 58813 postfix 1 4 0 5808K 1444K kqread 2 0:00 0.00% pickup 60237 sysadmin 1 20 0 10108K 2448K pause 2 0:00 0.00% tcsh 832 mysql 1 8 0 7064K 1216K wait 2 0:00 0.00% sh 41420 sysadmin 1 20 0 10108K 2604K pause 2 0:00 0.00% tcsh 60242 root 1 20 0 10108K 2388K pause 2 0:00 0.00% csh 60235 sysadmin 1 44 0 33772K 3864K select 1 0:00 0.00% sshd 993 root 1 5 0 5688K 1016K ttyin 1 0:00 0.00% getty 996 root 1 5 0 5688K 1016K ttyin 0 0:00 0.00% getty 60241 sysadmin 1 8 0 20440K 1588K wait 0 0:00 0.00% su 41425 sysadmin 1 8 0 20440K 1588K wait 0 0:00 0.00% su As you can see the active memory here is 294MB. While on DragonFly: load averages: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00; up 0+20:31:39 08:13:24 49 processes: 49 running CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.6% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.4% idle Memory: 1213M Active, 1836M Inact, 320M Wired, 25M Cache, 199M Buf, 114M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 2692K Used, 4093M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 1756 pgsql 152 0 833M 13M select 1 0:09 0.00% 0.00% postgres 1757 pgsql 152 0 833M 8324K select 0 0:08 0.00% 0.00% postgres 1759 pgsql 152 0 8536K 1252K poll 3 0:04 0.00% 0.00% postgres 1758 pgsql 152 0 833M 1724K select 3 0:02 0.00% 0.00% postgres 712 root 152 0 7880K 712K select 0 0:02 0.00% 0.00% httpd 677 root 152 0 5484K 1600K select 2 0:01 0.00% 0.00% sendmail 1754 pgsql 153 0 832M 3204K select 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% postgres 578 root 152 0 2276K 680K nanslp 1 0:00 0.00% 0.00% dntpd 897 sysadmin 152 0 7800K 888K select 3 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 1638 root 152 0 928K 4K nfsd 3 0:00 0.00% 0.00% nfsd 464 root 152 0 2864K 516K poll 1 0:00 0.00% 0.00% rpcbind 903 root 152 0 3968K 660K ttyin 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% csh 663 root 152 0 4984K 836K select 3 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 331 root 152 0 1756K 608K select 3 0:00 0.00% 0.00% syslogd 696 root 152 0 2556K 820K nanslp 3 0:00 0.00% 0.00% cron 895 root 157 0 7928K 788K sbwait 2 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 6325 root 152 0 7928K 2712K sbwait 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 1417 root 152 0 2396K 4K select 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% mountd 6350 root 152 0 3644K 1544K CPU1 1 0:00 0.00% 0.00% top 1637 root 152 0 1720K 40K select 3 0:00 0.00% 0.00% nfsd 6333 sysadmin 154 0 2904K 1380K wait 1 0:00 0.00% 0.00% su 6334 root 153 0 3484K 1296K pause 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% csh 801 root 153 0 2936K 576K wait 3 0:00 0.00% 0.00% login 822 root 152 0 3740K 284K ttyin 2 0:00 0.00% 0.00% csh 898 sysadmin 165 0 3612K 284K pause 3 0:00 0.00% 0.00% tcsh 804 root 159 0 1804K 464K ttyin 2 0:00 0.00% 0.00% getty 6328 sysadmin 153 0 3612K 1308K pause 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% tcsh 681 smmsp 153 0 5356K 916K pause 2 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sendmail 6327 sysadmin 152 0 7800K 2000K select 2 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 902 sysadmin 156 0 2904K 576K wait 2 0:00 0.00% 0.00% su The difference is clear. The 2 servers have same amount of physical memory. Im gonna try the memory program, but Im telling you all I really need to do is start doing some heavy IO and get those postgres processes going (they usually only use about 30MB RES memory) and the box starts swapping. Petr
文章代碼(AID): #1BALYZzZ (DFBSD_kernel)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1BALYZzZ (DFBSD_kernel)