Re: DragonFly_Stable tag
justin@shiningsilence.com wrote:
>>"Garance A Drosihn" <drosih@rpi.edu> wrote in message
>>news:p0611041ebd6e72c13fc5@[128.113.24.47]...
>>
>>>At 2:46 PM -0700 9/15/04, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am hoping to make DragonFly_Stable (maybe I should name it
>>>> something else) just be a float tag indicating a 'reasonably
>>>> stable point'
>>>
>>>Maybe some name to indicate that the tag itself is moving, and not
>>>a frozen point in time? E.g.: LATEST_SAFEBUILD RECENT_RESTSTOP
>>>or MOVING_TARGET (heh).
>>
>>What about LATEST_STABLE_BUILD? It has all the good connotations of
>>"stable", with an indicator that it's a moving tag.
>
>
> or KNOWN_GOOD, as that's what it was being called on the website when we
> had a 'known good' ISO. What do we then call 'tag=.'?
MAY_THE_SOURCE_BE_WITH_YOU
Sorry. just couldn't resist it.
>
> We should probably have cvsup config files to match.
>
>
>
--
Jasse -- Old Os/2 junkies never die, we just keep on rocking
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 9 篇)：