Re: DragonFly_Stable tag
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:27:15 -0400 (EDT), justin@shiningsilence.com
<justin@shiningsilence.com> wrote:
> > What about LATEST_STABLE_BUILD? It has all the good connotations of
> > "stable", with an indicator that it's a moving tag.
>
> or KNOWN_GOOD, as that's what it was being called on the website when we
> had a 'known good' ISO. What do we then call 'tag=.'?
>
> We should probably have cvsup config files to match.
>
LATEST_KNOWN_GOOD sounds ok STABLE at this point is hazy
--
eduardo:tongson [:] http://i.keepsilent.net [:] propolice[a]gmail.com
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 9 篇)：