Re: pulseaudio build
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Antonio Huete Jimenez
<ahuete.devel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it is not really implemented I think ENOSYS is more appropiate. But
> definitely the best thing at all is to implemented it :P
>
> Cheers,
> Antonio Huete
>
> 2010/6/13 Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>:
>> :>> ./t_ml
>> :> mlockall: Function not implemented
>> :
>> :Is it worth MFC'ing? 啱 have a vague feeling I had talked to someone about
>> :this before, but I can't find evidence of it.
>>
>> ꀠWhat direction are we talking about? 嗰aking it return ENOSYS or
>> ꀠmaking it return success but otherwise be a NOP ?
>>
>> ꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀭMatt
>> ꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠ嗰atthew Dillon
>> ꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀼdillon@backplane.com>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Antonio Huete
>
>
Returning ENOSYS is correct as per the specification.
The mlockall() and munlockall() functions will fail if:
[ENOSYS]
The implementation does not support this memory locking interface.
See: http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/mlockall.html
Sam
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 10 篇)：