Re: pulseaudio build
On Sun, June 13, 2010 12:41 am, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :>> ./t_ml
> :> mlockall: Function not implemented
> :
> :Is it worth MFC'ing? I have a vague feeling I had talked to someone
> about
> :this before, but I can't find evidence of it.
>
> What direction are we talking about? Making it return ENOSYS or
> making it return success but otherwise be a NOP ?
Whichever makes it build on 2.6. I don't know which that is. I'm a bit
suspicious, because I don't remember pulseaudio breaking on 2.6/x86_64.
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 10 篇)：