Re: IPFW2 layer2 support broken.
Jeffrey Hsu skrev:
> Now that we have IPFW2 working (or will soon) thanks to Gary Allan's
> tracking down the problem with ethernet headers, I wouldn't mind
> getting rid of IPFW1.
But IPFW2 still uses natd right? It's a ridicilously bad design of a NAT
system, it kills every mapping you have if you wanna load up a new config.
- Erik
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 7 篇)：