Re: IPFW2 layer2 support broken.
Erik P. Skaalerud wrote:
> This isnt exactly on topic with the subject, but perhaps its time to
> remove IPFW and natd? We have PF in base, wich in my opinion is
> superiour to IPFW..
>
> (please, do not start a flame war, I'm just asking here).
>
> - Erik
Now that we have IPFW2 working (or will soon) thanks to Gary Allan's
tracking down the problem with ethernet headers, I wouldn't mind
getting rid of IPFW1.
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 7 篇)：