Re: [心得] 皇家巨人
這是一篇在原文論壇上看到的文章,分析有關皇家巨人在遊戲中不平衡的原因
供大家參考,也希望有翻譯能力強的大大幫忙翻譯讓大家能夠理解
原文開始
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RG can't be efficiently shut down- Uncounterable tower damage troops are
cancer.
About me: 3080 max trophies, F2P, no legendaries.
A game like CR should be based on skill, timing, and strategy.
You should react to your opponent's moves, they should react to yours,
and the winner should be based on the above attributes.
Basically, if you can get more work done with less elixir,
you should gain an advantage and eventually win.
All troops in the game -- except the RG -- have efficient, reliable counters.
I'm going to define a counter as something with the following attributes:
1. Completely prevents the other card from doing its job (damaging troops
or towers)
2. Is efficient in terms of elixir (bomber vs barbarian horde is efficient,
Pekka vs barbarians is not, even though both win)
3. Is reliable, which means reasonably forgiving in terms of placement and
timing, and that the counter wins EVERY TIME, all other things being equal.
Note: A counter is NOT the same as being able to kill something.
I can kill a royal giant with any troop except a giant, hog, RG, or golem.
Any troop. But there are no troops or spells that COUNTER him.
ADDITIONALLY- he is very easy to protect because he has 2000+ life and
any supporting troops are often on the far side of the bridge,
safely out of Harm's way (I named my Valk Harm. Kidding.)
Therefore, it's very frustrating to play against one unless you have
legendary cards (which give their own advantage.)
As an example to what I mean, almost every other troop in the game has --not
one-- but MULTIPLE counters that exist. So if you really, really hate
balloon decks, you CAN design a deck that will never lose to a balloon (I've
done so) unless your balloon-based opponent is an evil genius.
You CANNOT design a deck to counter a RG so efficiently (I've tried.)
No matter what you do or how you play it, the RG gives an advantage, and is
therefore bad design and cheese. Yes, he CAN be stopped, but NOT efficiently
and THAT is the problem.
RG needs a rework -- longer deploy time, shorter range, less life, something.
The community isn't stupid and the frustration and negativity around this
card is a BAD thing.
Strong Emotions,
Zenon
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 216.31.219.19
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ClashRoyale/M.1467943231.A.602.html
→
07/08 10:05, , 1F
07/08 10:05, 1F
推
07/08 10:05, , 2F
07/08 10:05, 2F
推
07/08 10:08, , 3F
07/08 10:08, 3F
推
07/08 10:09, , 4F
07/08 10:09, 4F
推
07/08 10:10, , 5F
07/08 10:10, 5F
→
07/08 10:11, , 6F
07/08 10:11, 6F
推
07/08 10:21, , 7F
07/08 10:21, 7F
推
07/08 10:24, , 8F
07/08 10:24, 8F
→
07/08 10:24, , 9F
07/08 10:24, 9F
推
07/08 10:30, , 10F
07/08 10:30, 10F
→
07/08 10:30, , 11F
07/08 10:30, 11F
→
07/08 10:30, , 12F
07/08 10:30, 12F
推
07/08 10:30, , 13F
07/08 10:30, 13F
→
07/08 10:32, , 14F
07/08 10:32, 14F
→
07/08 10:34, , 15F
07/08 10:34, 15F
→
07/08 10:37, , 16F
07/08 10:37, 16F
→
07/08 10:40, , 17F
07/08 10:40, 17F
→
07/08 10:43, , 18F
07/08 10:43, 18F
推
07/08 10:48, , 19F
07/08 10:48, 19F
推
07/08 10:53, , 20F
07/08 10:53, 20F
→
07/08 10:54, , 21F
07/08 10:54, 21F
→
07/08 10:54, , 22F
07/08 10:54, 22F
→
07/08 10:56, , 23F
07/08 10:56, 23F
→
07/08 10:56, , 24F
07/08 10:56, 24F
推
07/08 10:59, , 25F
07/08 10:59, 25F
推
07/08 10:59, , 26F
07/08 10:59, 26F
→
07/08 11:00, , 27F
07/08 11:00, 27F
→
07/08 11:00, , 28F
07/08 11:00, 28F
推
07/08 11:08, , 29F
07/08 11:08, 29F
推
07/08 11:08, , 30F
07/08 11:08, 30F
→
07/08 11:10, , 31F
07/08 11:10, 31F
→
07/08 11:11, , 32F
07/08 11:11, 32F
→
07/08 11:14, , 33F
07/08 11:14, 33F
→
07/08 11:20, , 34F
07/08 11:20, 34F
推
07/08 11:38, , 35F
07/08 11:38, 35F
→
07/08 11:38, , 36F
07/08 11:38, 36F
推
07/08 12:09, , 37F
07/08 12:09, 37F
→
07/08 12:10, , 38F
07/08 12:10, 38F
→
07/08 12:14, , 39F
07/08 12:14, 39F
→
07/08 12:14, , 40F
07/08 12:14, 40F
→
07/08 12:19, , 41F
07/08 12:19, 41F
→
07/08 12:19, , 42F
07/08 12:19, 42F
→
07/08 12:36, , 43F
07/08 12:36, 43F
→
07/08 12:37, , 44F
07/08 12:37, 44F
→
07/08 12:41, , 45F
07/08 12:41, 45F
→
07/08 12:41, , 46F
07/08 12:41, 46F
推
07/08 14:01, , 47F
07/08 14:01, 47F
→
07/08 14:02, , 48F
07/08 14:02, 48F
推
07/08 14:06, , 49F
07/08 14:06, 49F
→
07/08 14:06, , 50F
07/08 14:06, 50F
→
07/08 14:06, , 51F
07/08 14:06, 51F
推
07/08 14:08, , 52F
07/08 14:08, 52F
推
07/08 18:39, , 53F
07/08 18:39, 53F
→
07/09 11:20, , 54F
07/09 11:20, 54F
→
07/09 11:21, , 55F
07/09 11:21, 55F
→
07/09 11:22, , 56F
07/09 11:22, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
心得
4
4
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 11 篇):
心得
60
64
心得
17
34
心得
28
145
心得
4
5
心得
20
56
心得
10
10
心得
4
4
心得
-1
16
心得
13
57
心得
9
26