[外電] 關於KG & 雷槍續留的負面評論...
新聞出處(必填):http://tinyurl.com/btumrpu
作者: Chris Mannix
Pretty much as I expected, though I'm not sure I agree that KG is retiring.
It's like he finally has become a low post center after all these years
fighting it and has had a rebirth as a superstar. Why would he walk away at
the age of 36? We're not talking Rasheed Wallace who was on his last legs? KG
was still dominating. He will get HUGE offers and it will be up to Danny to
decide whether to invest in multiple years for KG at the risk of punting our
cap space.
一如我先前的預期, KG應該不會退休, 他成了他生涯一直在對抗著的低位中鋒, 並重新
成為超級球星, 那他為什麼要在36歲退休呢? 這跟當初Rasheed Wallace不同, KG 還是
有著滿滿的統治力, 所以他將會尋求超˙大˙的合約, 這將取決於安吉是否要冒著用光
扣打的風險投資在KG身上
I know people think I'm being harsh on Ray Allen, but I do believe he's
entering the "shell of his former self" stage of his career. He used to be a
running, dunking athlete, who you could give the ball to and he could create
on his own. Now he is essentially just a shooter, who you need to run
multiple picks for to get him open. Also, because he's no threat to drive or
post up, other teams have the luxury of putting their point guards on him
defensively, as both the Lakers and Heat have done. The Celtics really took
off when they swapped Ray in the starting line-up for Avery Bradley and I
feel that moving forward they need to continue to start a younger, more
athletic guard. If Bradley doesn't get hurt we're in the Finals right now. In
fact if the Ray Allen for OJ Mayo and a pick trade went down I believe we're
also in the Finals.
有人或許會質疑我對雷槍的評論過於嚴苛, 但我相信雷槍現在跑進了以前那個自我的殼
中(sorry這個不太會翻). 雷槍本來是能跑能灌籃的球員, 是個你能放心把球給他然後
他會自己創造出手機會的人, 但現在卻只是個射手, 你得傳好幾次才能幫他創造出空間
出手. 同時, 他已經沒有切入跟post up的威脅性, 所以像是湖人跟熱火都不會浪費的
把後衛拿去防守他. 超賽在把小AB拉上先發取代雷槍後戰績轉好許多, 如果小AB能一直
維持健康, 或是當初把雷槍拿去換OJ Mayo跟一個選秀權, 超賽現在早就要打總冠軍了
I don't see Ray accepting a bench role for small money from Boston when at
least one other team will offer him more money and a starting role. Not to
mention, Danny's shopped him the past few trading deadlines, and he lost his
starting gig this season, so his sense of loyalty to Boston has waned some
(as has been reported). I think Ray will get at a minimum the full MLE from a
prospective contender. Regarding KG, it will come down to how much money he's
willing to leave on the table. I could see a team like the Nets offering him
something ridiculous like 4 years at $50 million. Not sure how the Celtics
can match that. Hopefully, if KG decides to return, Danny can negotiate a 2
year deal before other suitors get to enter the picture in July.
我不覺得雷槍會接受Boston錢少少的板凳合約, 畢竟還有其他球隊捧著比較多的錢跟先
發位置準備簽他, 這季交易大限前安吉把雷槍放在交易桌上幾次, 並且這季他失去過先
發位置, 所以一如以前報導過的, 雷槍對Boston的忠誠度就得用其他東西來補足了.
所以我覺得雷槍會從下一季有希望競爭冠軍金盃的隊伍拿到一份full MLE的合約
至於真˙男人KG呢, 就得看多少錢了, 尤其是風聞籃網放出風聲提出一份愚蠢的四年五
千萬美金的合約. 並不確定超賽是否能提出KG滿意的條件, 但希望如果KG決定回到超賽
, 安吉可以在其他球隊搶走KG之前, 用一份兩年的合約留下他
個人心得....
對於喜愛雷槍 & KG的我來說, 翻譯這篇真是辛酸啊...
但Business is business, 不得不承認KG 今年的好表現真的會吸引許多大金額的合約
至於雷槍..超賽有小AB(健康的話), 先發位置要留給雷槍似乎也有點難度
加上其他有奪冠希望的球隊也會來競逐雷槍, 然後超賽的薪資空間...
一切隨緣吧~
--
清晨霧一般的思念, 清新 double, 美麗 double, 捉摸不定 double...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.250.135.187
推
06/11 17:53, , 1F
06/11 17:53, 1F
噓
06/11 17:55, , 2F
06/11 17:55, 2F
→
06/11 17:55, , 3F
06/11 17:55, 3F
→
06/11 17:57, , 4F
06/11 17:57, 4F
推
06/11 17:57, , 5F
06/11 17:57, 5F
推
06/11 17:58, , 6F
06/11 17:58, 6F
推
06/11 17:58, , 7F
06/11 17:58, 7F
→
06/11 18:00, , 8F
06/11 18:00, 8F
→
06/11 18:00, , 9F
06/11 18:00, 9F
→
06/11 18:00, , 10F
06/11 18:00, 10F
→
06/11 18:01, , 11F
06/11 18:01, 11F
推
06/11 18:03, , 12F
06/11 18:03, 12F
→
06/11 18:05, , 13F
06/11 18:05, 13F
→
06/11 18:06, , 14F
06/11 18:06, 14F
推
06/11 18:08, , 15F
06/11 18:08, 15F
推
06/11 18:08, , 16F
06/11 18:08, 16F
→
06/11 18:09, , 17F
06/11 18:09, 17F
→
06/11 18:10, , 18F
06/11 18:10, 18F
→
06/11 18:15, , 19F
06/11 18:15, 19F
推
06/11 18:27, , 20F
06/11 18:27, 20F
噓
06/11 18:29, , 21F
06/11 18:29, 21F
推
06/11 18:29, , 22F
06/11 18:29, 22F
推
06/11 18:34, , 23F
06/11 18:34, 23F
推
06/11 18:40, , 24F
06/11 18:40, 24F
推
06/11 18:40, , 25F
06/11 18:40, 25F
→
06/11 18:43, , 26F
06/11 18:43, 26F
推
06/11 19:07, , 27F
06/11 19:07, 27F
→
06/11 19:07, , 28F
06/11 19:07, 28F
推
06/11 19:21, , 29F
06/11 19:21, 29F
→
06/11 19:22, , 30F
06/11 19:22, 30F
推
06/11 19:23, , 31F
06/11 19:23, 31F
→
06/11 19:25, , 32F
06/11 19:25, 32F
推
06/11 19:25, , 33F
06/11 19:25, 33F
→
06/11 19:26, , 34F
06/11 19:26, 34F
→
06/11 19:30, , 35F
06/11 19:30, 35F
→
06/11 19:30, , 36F
06/11 19:30, 36F
→
06/11 19:30, , 37F
06/11 19:30, 37F
→
06/11 19:30, , 38F
06/11 19:30, 38F
推
06/11 19:40, , 39F
06/11 19:40, 39F
→
06/11 19:40, , 40F
06/11 19:40, 40F
→
06/11 19:41, , 41F
06/11 19:41, 41F
推
06/11 19:42, , 42F
06/11 19:42, 42F
推
06/11 19:43, , 43F
06/11 19:43, 43F
推
06/11 19:46, , 44F
06/11 19:46, 44F
→
06/11 19:48, , 45F
06/11 19:48, 45F
→
06/11 19:49, , 46F
06/11 19:49, 46F
→
06/11 19:50, , 47F
06/11 19:50, 47F
→
06/11 19:51, , 48F
06/11 19:51, 48F
推
06/11 19:54, , 49F
06/11 19:54, 49F
→
06/11 20:03, , 50F
06/11 20:03, 50F
推
06/11 20:03, , 51F
06/11 20:03, 51F
推
06/11 20:06, , 52F
06/11 20:06, 52F
推
06/11 20:12, , 53F
06/11 20:12, 53F
→
06/11 20:19, , 54F
06/11 20:19, 54F
→
06/11 20:23, , 55F
06/11 20:23, 55F
→
06/11 20:25, , 56F
06/11 20:25, 56F
→
06/11 20:26, , 57F
06/11 20:26, 57F
→
06/11 20:29, , 58F
06/11 20:29, 58F
推
06/11 20:39, , 59F
06/11 20:39, 59F
噓
06/11 20:53, , 60F
06/11 20:53, 60F
→
06/11 20:56, , 61F
06/11 20:56, 61F
推
06/11 20:59, , 62F
06/11 20:59, 62F
推
06/11 21:02, , 63F
06/11 21:02, 63F
→
06/11 21:03, , 64F
06/11 21:03, 64F
推
06/11 21:08, , 65F
06/11 21:08, 65F
推
06/11 21:45, , 66F
06/11 21:45, 66F
→
06/11 21:46, , 67F
06/11 21:46, 67F
→
06/11 21:46, , 68F
06/11 21:46, 68F
→
06/11 21:47, , 69F
06/11 21:47, 69F
→
06/11 21:48, , 70F
06/11 21:48, 70F
推
06/11 21:49, , 71F
06/11 21:49, 71F
→
06/11 21:51, , 72F
06/11 21:51, 72F
推
06/11 21:53, , 73F
06/11 21:53, 73F
推
06/11 22:11, , 74F
06/11 22:11, 74F
推
06/11 22:42, , 75F
06/11 22:42, 75F
→
06/11 22:43, , 76F
06/11 22:43, 76F
→
06/11 22:53, , 77F
06/11 22:53, 77F
推
06/11 23:01, , 78F
06/11 23:01, 78F
→
06/11 23:01, , 79F
06/11 23:01, 79F
→
06/11 23:02, , 80F
06/11 23:02, 80F
→
06/11 23:02, , 81F
06/11 23:02, 81F
→
06/11 23:08, , 82F
06/11 23:08, 82F
→
06/11 23:15, , 83F
06/11 23:15, 83F
→
06/11 23:26, , 84F
06/11 23:26, 84F
→
06/11 23:26, , 85F
06/11 23:26, 85F
推
06/11 23:34, , 86F
06/11 23:34, 86F
推
06/12 00:34, , 87F
06/12 00:34, 87F
→
06/12 00:35, , 88F
06/12 00:35, 88F
推
06/12 00:48, , 89F
06/12 00:48, 89F
→
06/12 00:48, , 90F
06/12 00:48, 90F
推
06/12 03:22, , 91F
06/12 03:22, 91F
→
06/12 03:23, , 92F
06/12 03:23, 92F
→
06/12 03:23, , 93F
06/12 03:23, 93F
→
06/13 21:03, , 94F
06/13 21:03, 94F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):