[討論] 對Allen為什麼這兩場比賽打這麼久的看法
這兩場可以看出三巨頭裡ray allen是打最久的,甚至第二場贏這麼多還要打到快四十分
鐘,個人看法如下
(1)三巨頭裡假如選出重要的兩名球員,應該就是PIERCE和GARNETT,所以ALLEN就必須帶
領替補球員一起打球,因為之前GARNETT上一季預賽後面受傷,導致季後賽無法打入總冠
軍,這樣大家應該知道打太久容易造成受傷的機率,因此河流才會讓PIERCE和GARNETT休
息較多的時間。
(2)另外為什麼是ALLEN來帶領替補球員一起打球,而不是PIERCE,可能是後衛太少,或則
是培養ALLEN領袖風範,因為PIERCE是賽隊的隊長,領袖風範就不用講了,但是PIERCE受
傷的話,勢必要有人來帶領球隊。
(3)其實ALLEN到季後賽,有一個毛病就是投籃時穩時不穩,準的時候嚇死人,不準的時候
也嚇死人,因此之前還被傳出被交易的風聲,所以河流可能讓ALLEN培養投籃的穩定度,才
會讓ALLEN打的時間比較久。
各位想法如何~~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.224.241.163
推
10/29 20:26, , 1F
10/29 20:26, 1F
→
10/29 20:26, , 2F
10/29 20:26, 2F
推
10/29 20:28, , 3F
10/29 20:28, 3F
→
10/29 20:29, , 4F
10/29 20:29, 4F
推
10/29 20:29, , 5F
10/29 20:29, 5F
→
10/29 20:30, , 6F
10/29 20:30, 6F
→
10/29 20:30, , 7F
10/29 20:30, 7F
推
10/29 20:39, , 8F
10/29 20:39, 8F
→
10/29 20:40, , 9F
10/29 20:40, 9F
→
10/29 20:40, , 10F
10/29 20:40, 10F
推
10/29 20:41, , 11F
10/29 20:41, 11F
→
10/29 20:41, , 12F
10/29 20:41, 12F
→
10/29 20:41, , 13F
10/29 20:41, 13F
→
10/29 20:42, , 14F
10/29 20:42, 14F
推
10/29 20:43, , 15F
10/29 20:43, 15F
→
10/29 20:52, , 16F
10/29 20:52, 16F
推
10/29 21:04, , 17F
10/29 21:04, 17F
→
10/29 21:04, , 18F
10/29 21:04, 18F
推
10/29 21:11, , 19F
10/29 21:11, 19F
→
10/29 21:11, , 20F
10/29 21:11, 20F
→
10/29 21:11, , 21F
10/29 21:11, 21F
推
10/29 21:14, , 22F
10/29 21:14, 22F
→
10/29 21:15, , 23F
10/29 21:15, 23F
推
10/29 21:16, , 24F
10/29 21:16, 24F
→
10/29 21:16, , 25F
10/29 21:16, 25F
→
10/29 21:17, , 26F
10/29 21:17, 26F
推
10/29 21:31, , 27F
10/29 21:31, 27F
→
10/29 21:31, , 28F
10/29 21:31, 28F
→
10/29 21:31, , 29F
10/29 21:31, 29F
→
10/29 21:34, , 30F
10/29 21:34, 30F
推
10/29 21:38, , 31F
10/29 21:38, 31F
推
10/29 22:16, , 32F
10/29 22:16, 32F
→
10/29 22:17, , 33F
10/29 22:17, 33F
推
10/29 22:38, , 34F
10/29 22:38, 34F
→
10/29 22:40, , 35F
10/29 22:40, 35F
噓
10/29 22:46, , 36F
10/29 22:46, 36F
推
10/29 22:48, , 37F
10/29 22:48, 37F
→
10/29 22:50, , 38F
10/29 22:50, 38F
推
10/29 23:56, , 39F
10/29 23:56, 39F
推
10/30 00:06, , 40F
10/30 00:06, 40F
→
10/30 00:34, , 41F
10/30 00:34, 41F
→
10/30 01:00, , 42F
10/30 01:00, 42F
→
10/30 01:01, , 43F
10/30 01:01, 43F
→
10/30 02:42, , 44F
10/30 02:42, 44F
噓
10/30 09:33, , 45F
10/30 09:33, 45F
推
10/30 09:36, , 46F
10/30 09:36, 46F
推
10/30 09:45, , 47F
10/30 09:45, 47F
→
10/30 09:46, , 48F
10/30 09:46, 48F
推
10/30 10:44, , 49F
10/30 10:44, 49F
推
10/30 11:36, , 50F
10/30 11:36, 50F
→
10/30 12:26, , 51F
10/30 12:26, 51F
→
10/30 12:28, , 52F
10/30 12:28, 52F
→
10/30 12:29, , 53F
10/30 12:29, 53F
→
10/30 12:32, , 54F
10/30 12:32, 54F
→
10/30 12:34, , 55F
10/30 12:34, 55F
→
10/30 12:36, , 56F
10/30 12:36, 56F
→
10/30 12:37, , 57F
10/30 12:37, 57F
噓
10/30 17:47, , 58F
10/30 17:47, 58F
→
10/30 17:48, , 59F
10/30 17:48, 59F
→
10/31 01:00, , 60F
10/31 01:00, 60F
噓
10/31 09:59, , 61F
10/31 09:59, 61F
推
11/02 20:57, , 62F
11/02 20:57, 62F
→
11/02 20:58, , 63F
11/02 20:58, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):