Re: [閒聊] 假如草案通過 那些作品最有可能被禁?
※ 引述《w40w40w40w40 ()》之銘言:
: 就現在版上吵得沸沸揚揚的聯合國防範二次元兒童色情草案啦
: 假如真的通過並且實施
: 現下有哪些作品有可能會被禁呢?
: 我覺得物語系列極危險啦
假如草案通過...
那不是當然應該先來看草案講啥嗎?
https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?
symbolno=INT/CRC/INF/8870&Lang=en
61. Child pornography is defined in article 2 OPSC as
“any representation of a child engaged in real or simulated explicit
sexual activities, regardless of the means used, or any representation of
the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes”
這段是OPSC( https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPSCCRC.aspx )
裡對兒色的定義
62. The Committee urges States parties to prohibit, by law, child sexual abuse
material in any form. The Committee notes that such material is
increasingly circulating online, and strongly recommends States parties to
ensure that relevant provisions of their Criminal Codes cover all forms of
material, including when the acts listed in article 3.1(c) are committed
online and including when such material represents realistic
representations of non-existing children.
OPSC article 3.1(c)的定義是
(c) Producing, distributing, disseminating, importing, exporting, offering,
selling or possessing for the above purposes child pornography as defined
in article 2.
草案強烈建議各國建立刑法條款針對
製造分發散播進口出口提供銷售以及持有相關兒色物件者
即使那些物件是擬真表現的非現實存在的孩童也算
(以上渣翻,有更好翻譯的人請賜教)
63. The Committee is of the view that “simulated explicit sexual activities”
should be interpreted as including any material, online or offline, that
depicts or otherwise represents any person appearing to be a child engaged
in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct and realistic and/or virtual
depictions of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
Such depictions contribute to normalising the sexualisation of children
and fuels the demand of child sexual abuse material.
64. Moreover, for the reasons explained in paragraph 63, any representation of
the sexual parts of a child, including realistic images of the sexual
organs of a child, for primarily sexual purposes falls under the
definition of this offence.
Where it may be complicated to establish with certainty if a
representation is intended or used for “primarily sexual purposes”,
the Committee deems it necessary to consider the context in which it is
being used.
所以也是有但書的,有些東西算不算兒色要看狀況,看是不是主要用在性的目的上
當然文字是死的,解釋權是活的就是了
--
整篇落落長有119點,從對兒童保護的建議,人口販賣、賣春、色情利用等罪行定義
到法律制裁審判引渡以及對受害者的幫助與保護等等都有
要說人家就是衝著二次元來嘛...我覺得言過了
對了
The Committee invites all interested parties to comment on the current draft
of the Guidelines. Comments are welcome on all aspects of the draft Guidelines,
and after due consideration of inputs provided, the Committee will decide on
the contents of the final version of the Guidelines.
有什麼意見人家歡迎你寄word檔去 crc@ohchr.org
--
放鬆心情
讓那動人的旋律
聽聽音樂吧
<(┘╴└)>﹍﹍﹍▎ 帶走所有的憂愁
〈﹨︿ ﹨︿ ╴▅
生命,就該浪費在美好的事物上
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.250.75.122
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1550560547.A.D7F.html
→
02/19 15:17,
5年前
, 1F
02/19 15:17, 1F
推
02/19 15:20,
5年前
, 2F
02/19 15:20, 2F
推
02/19 15:20,
5年前
, 3F
02/19 15:20, 3F
→
02/19 15:24,
5年前
, 4F
02/19 15:24, 4F
→
02/19 15:26,
5年前
, 5F
02/19 15:26, 5F
推
02/19 15:26,
5年前
, 6F
02/19 15:26, 6F
→
02/19 15:27,
5年前
, 7F
02/19 15:27, 7F
→
02/19 15:27,
5年前
, 8F
02/19 15:27, 8F
像那個primarily sexual purposes就很有得扯
保守一點講,小叮噹裡的宜靜入浴完全可以safe
要上綱上線,看版上相關文章一堆人對著空氣畫靶再射箭射得很開心
不過我的重點是看下去之後人家的草案其實提了非常多面向的東西
不是只有找二次元麻煩
推
02/19 15:27,
5年前
, 9F
02/19 15:27, 9F
→
02/19 15:28,
5年前
, 10F
02/19 15:28, 10F
→
02/19 15:29,
5年前
, 11F
02/19 15:29, 11F
→
02/19 15:30,
5年前
, 12F
02/19 15:30, 12F
推
02/19 15:42,
5年前
, 13F
02/19 15:42, 13F
※ 編輯: seaEPC (60.250.75.122), 02/19/2019 16:00:57
→
02/19 16:58,
5年前
, 14F
02/19 16:58, 14F
→
02/19 16:58,
5年前
, 15F
02/19 16:58, 15F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 8 篇):