[閒聊] 為什麼鳴人跟佐助小時候待遇不一樣已回收
鳴人爸媽為了保護村子而死 從小被當人柱力犧牲品
按照道理來說村人要特別照顧這個小孩才對
結果不是 大人排擠他 連帶叫小孩不要跟他玩
佐助 中二病一族的遺孤 村人如果沒有失憶症都知道這一族就是個大麻煩
中二病發作起來就是禍患 但沒人知道他甚麼時候會發病
你可以把他看做一顆不定時炸彈 果不其然
後患無窮 三番兩次要炸村子 發作起來連五影都會怕
但佐助從小羅莉都喜歡他 可以見得村子裡的大人沒有特別針對他
為什麼一個不定時炸彈沒受排擠 一個犧牲一切卻受到排擠?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.34.159.161
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1504429854.A.56F.html
→
09/03 17:12, , 1F
09/03 17:12, 1F
推
09/03 17:12, , 2F
09/03 17:12, 2F
推
09/03 17:12, , 3F
09/03 17:12, 3F
推
09/03 17:12, , 4F
09/03 17:12, 4F
推
09/03 17:14, , 5F
09/03 17:14, 5F
→
09/03 17:14, , 6F
09/03 17:14, 6F
→
09/03 17:14, , 7F
09/03 17:14, 7F
推
09/03 17:15, , 8F
09/03 17:15, 8F
推
09/03 17:15, , 9F
09/03 17:15, 9F
→
09/03 17:15, , 10F
09/03 17:15, 10F
→
09/03 17:15, , 11F
09/03 17:15, 11F
推
09/03 17:15, , 12F
09/03 17:15, 12F
可是宇智波這種麻煩的血統 情報沒外流封鎖得住
老一輩的人也沒人知道 再者依照團藏的個性 要派一些暗部去監視佐助才對吧
→
09/03 17:16, , 13F
09/03 17:16, 13F
推
09/03 17:16, , 14F
09/03 17:16, 14F
→
09/03 17:16, , 15F
09/03 17:16, 15F
→
09/03 17:16, , 16F
09/03 17:16, 16F
※ 編輯: kyo3tree (114.34.159.161), 09/03/2017 17:22:16
推
09/03 17:20, , 17F
09/03 17:20, 17F
→
09/03 17:22, , 18F
09/03 17:22, 18F
→
09/03 17:22, , 19F
09/03 17:22, 19F
→
09/03 17:22, , 20F
09/03 17:22, 20F
→
09/03 17:22, , 21F
09/03 17:22, 21F
→
09/03 17:22, , 22F
09/03 17:22, 22F
→
09/03 17:22, , 23F
09/03 17:22, 23F
→
09/03 17:23, , 24F
09/03 17:23, 24F
→
09/03 17:24, , 25F
09/03 17:24, 25F
推
09/03 17:26, , 26F
09/03 17:26, 26F
→
09/03 17:27, , 27F
09/03 17:27, 27F
→
09/03 17:28, , 28F
09/03 17:28, 28F
→
09/03 17:28, , 29F
09/03 17:28, 29F
團藏沒在佐助叛逃時派暗部把他做掉這點我覺得很迷 而且他還可以打著大義
幼苗要在沒成長之前就摘除 才合乎他的個性
※ 編輯: kyo3tree (114.34.159.161), 09/03/2017 17:32:49
推
09/03 17:33, , 30F
09/03 17:33, 30F
→
09/03 17:43, , 31F
09/03 17:43, 31F
推
09/03 17:43, , 32F
09/03 17:43, 32F
→
09/03 17:44, , 33F
09/03 17:44, 33F
→
09/03 17:47, , 34F
09/03 17:47, 34F
推
09/03 17:47, , 35F
09/03 17:47, 35F
→
09/03 17:47, , 36F
09/03 17:47, 36F
→
09/03 17:48, , 37F
09/03 17:48, 37F
→
09/03 17:49, , 38F
09/03 17:49, 38F
推
09/03 17:49, , 39F
09/03 17:49, 39F
推
09/03 17:50, , 40F
09/03 17:50, 40F
→
09/03 17:50, , 41F
09/03 17:50, 41F
→
09/03 17:50, , 42F
09/03 17:50, 42F
→
09/03 17:51, , 43F
09/03 17:51, 43F
推
09/03 17:51, , 44F
09/03 17:51, 44F
→
09/03 17:52, , 45F
09/03 17:52, 45F
推
09/03 17:52, , 46F
09/03 17:52, 46F
→
09/03 17:53, , 47F
09/03 17:53, 47F
→
09/03 17:53, , 48F
09/03 17:53, 48F
噓
09/03 18:39, , 49F
09/03 18:39, 49F
推
09/03 20:10, , 50F
09/03 20:10, 50F
推
09/03 20:41, , 51F
09/03 20:41, 51F
→
09/03 20:45, , 52F
09/03 20:45, 52F
→
09/03 20:59, , 53F
09/03 20:59, 53F
→
09/03 23:57, , 54F
09/03 23:57, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):