[討論] 單就策略來說遊戲海馬馬力克城之內誰強?已回收
昨天有人提到遊戲王我剛好想起當時城之內打馬利克熱血到不行的一戰
馬利克一開始機八卡連發,什麼地獄詩人 熔岩魔神一堆的
每回合不是減少你的排就是減少你的生命值
結果城之內硬是逼得馬利克拿出神之卡,而且還贏了(實質上
感覺城之內的戰略其實不錯,都可以把自己牌組發揮很高效益
反觀海馬雖然好像有一堆很屌的牌,結果好像都只能虐菜
打馬姐姐也是靠老婆青眼白龍威能才贏的
對遊戲永遠都是被虐
遊戲就是外掛點滿,每次都可以多一張沒看過的卡改變戰局
馬利克牌組感覺是四人中最強的,只是很容易老馬之外總是想用翼神龍來拿勝
搞得很多強卡都沒什麼發揮就變成幫翼神龍鋪路
就戰略來說這四人是不是
城之內>遊戲>馬利克=海馬
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.10.81.102
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1495034923.A.2B2.html
推
05/17 23:29, , 1F
05/17 23:29, 1F
推
05/17 23:30, , 2F
05/17 23:30, 2F
→
05/17 23:30, , 3F
05/17 23:30, 3F
→
05/17 23:30, , 4F
05/17 23:30, 4F
推
05/17 23:31, , 5F
05/17 23:31, 5F
→
05/17 23:31, , 6F
05/17 23:31, 6F
→
05/17 23:34, , 7F
05/17 23:34, 7F
其實我很好奇海馬真的打得贏城之內嗎
※ 編輯: glthe1 (101.10.81.102), 05/17/2017 23:37:45
推
05/17 23:38, , 8F
05/17 23:38, 8F
推
05/17 23:38, , 9F
05/17 23:38, 9F
城之內光是電子機器人我就覺得夠op了
※ 編輯: glthe1 (101.10.81.102), 05/17/2017 23:40:24
推
05/17 23:40, , 10F
05/17 23:40, 10F
推
05/17 23:41, , 11F
05/17 23:41, 11F
推
05/17 23:42, , 12F
05/17 23:42, 12F
→
05/17 23:43, , 13F
05/17 23:43, 13F
→
05/17 23:44, , 14F
05/17 23:44, 14F
真的,光是什麼國王皇后還有三個磁鐵人
※ 編輯: glthe1 (101.10.81.102), 05/17/2017 23:44:56
→
05/17 23:44, , 15F
05/17 23:44, 15F
→
05/17 23:45, , 16F
05/17 23:45, 16F
推
05/17 23:45, , 17F
05/17 23:45, 17F
→
05/17 23:46, , 18F
05/17 23:46, 18F
→
05/17 23:46, , 19F
05/17 23:46, 19F
→
05/17 23:47, , 20F
05/17 23:47, 20F
推
05/17 23:50, , 21F
05/17 23:50, 21F
→
05/17 23:56, , 22F
05/17 23:56, 22F
→
05/17 23:56, , 23F
05/17 23:56, 23F
推
05/17 23:58, , 24F
05/17 23:58, 24F
→
05/18 00:02, , 25F
05/18 00:02, 25F
推
05/18 00:11, , 26F
05/18 00:11, 26F
→
05/18 00:11, , 27F
05/18 00:11, 27F
→
05/18 00:12, , 28F
05/18 00:12, 28F
不給人用真的超扯的XDD這種卡沒問題嗎
推
05/18 00:14, , 29F
05/18 00:14, 29F
→
05/18 00:15, , 30F
05/18 00:15, 30F
→
05/18 00:16, , 31F
05/18 00:16, 31F
※ 編輯: glthe1 (101.10.81.102), 05/18/2017 00:20:15
推
05/18 00:26, , 32F
05/18 00:26, 32F
推
05/18 00:27, , 33F
05/18 00:27, 33F
推
05/18 00:27, , 34F
05/18 00:27, 34F
推
05/18 00:28, , 35F
05/18 00:28, 35F
→
05/18 00:28, , 36F
05/18 00:28, 36F
→
05/18 00:32, , 37F
05/18 00:32, 37F
→
05/18 00:33, , 38F
05/18 00:33, 38F
推
05/18 00:42, , 39F
05/18 00:42, 39F
→
05/18 00:42, , 40F
05/18 00:42, 40F
→
05/18 00:43, , 41F
05/18 00:43, 41F
→
05/18 00:43, , 42F
05/18 00:43, 42F
→
05/18 00:44, , 43F
05/18 00:44, 43F
→
05/18 00:45, , 44F
05/18 00:45, 44F
推
05/18 00:46, , 45F
05/18 00:46, 45F
推
05/18 00:46, , 46F
05/18 00:46, 46F
推
05/18 00:51, , 47F
05/18 00:51, 47F
→
05/18 00:52, , 48F
05/18 00:52, 48F
→
05/18 00:52, , 49F
05/18 00:52, 49F
推
05/18 00:53, , 50F
05/18 00:53, 50F
→
05/18 00:53, , 51F
05/18 00:53, 51F
→
05/18 00:53, , 52F
05/18 00:53, 52F
推
05/18 00:54, , 53F
05/18 00:54, 53F
推
05/18 01:10, , 54F
05/18 01:10, 54F
推
05/18 03:20, , 55F
05/18 03:20, 55F
推
05/18 05:02, , 56F
05/18 05:02, 56F
→
05/18 05:02, , 57F
05/18 05:02, 57F
→
05/18 05:03, , 58F
05/18 05:03, 58F
推
05/18 07:00, , 59F
05/18 07:00, 59F
推
05/18 07:15, , 60F
05/18 07:15, 60F
→
05/18 07:15, , 61F
05/18 07:15, 61F
推
05/18 07:45, , 62F
05/18 07:45, 62F
推
05/18 08:15, , 63F
05/18 08:15, 63F
→
05/18 08:15, , 64F
05/18 08:15, 64F
→
05/18 10:32, , 65F
05/18 10:32, 65F
推
05/18 10:52, , 66F
05/18 10:52, 66F
推
05/18 16:54, , 67F
05/18 16:54, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):