[討論] 射擊遊戲來說,"爆頭"是最有效攻擊方式嗎?已回收
看板C_Chat作者Emerson158 (紅豆 X 八嘎 X 烏魯賽)時間7年前 (2017/03/12 21:55)推噓31(31推 0噓 30→)留言61則, 39人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
聽起來好像是廢話,
真像是個新人提出來的問題,
頭被打到一發,不管是哪個部位,大概都失能或直接GG惹
然則,
小弟有看到一種說法,相較頭部目標較小且躲避積極,不好瞄準
肢幹目標較大,較好瞄準,先打中讓對方失去平衡在補頭,一樣是給他GG
目前看到做的最確實的電影是John Wick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74kA26X3eaI
誠實預告片(電影老實說)--捍衛任務
老實說剪得沒有很明顯,其實基哥很多都是一槍身體一槍捕頭的節奏 有點專業XD||?
射擊遊戲是否也是這樣打比較有效率呢?
當然設定上必須被打到要失衡才是前提..
--
Sent from my Nokia3310
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.228.113.25
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1489326947.A.8D7.html
推
03/12 21:57, , 1F
03/12 21:57, 1F
推
03/12 21:57, , 2F
03/12 21:57, 2F
推
03/12 21:57, , 3F
03/12 21:57, 3F
推
03/12 21:58, , 4F
03/12 21:58, 4F
推
03/12 21:58, , 5F
03/12 21:58, 5F
推
03/12 21:58, , 6F
03/12 21:58, 6F
推
03/12 21:59, , 7F
03/12 21:59, 7F
推
03/12 21:59, , 8F
03/12 21:59, 8F
→
03/12 21:59, , 9F
03/12 21:59, 9F
→
03/12 21:59, , 10F
03/12 21:59, 10F
→
03/12 21:59, , 11F
03/12 21:59, 11F
推
03/12 22:00, , 12F
03/12 22:00, 12F
推
03/12 22:01, , 13F
03/12 22:01, 13F
→
03/12 22:04, , 14F
03/12 22:04, 14F
推
03/12 22:05, , 15F
03/12 22:05, 15F
推
03/12 22:06, , 16F
03/12 22:06, 16F
→
03/12 22:06, , 17F
03/12 22:06, 17F
推
03/12 22:09, , 18F
03/12 22:09, 18F
推
03/12 22:10, , 19F
03/12 22:10, 19F
推
03/12 22:10, , 20F
03/12 22:10, 20F
→
03/12 22:11, , 21F
03/12 22:11, 21F
→
03/12 22:11, , 22F
03/12 22:11, 22F
推
03/12 22:13, , 23F
03/12 22:13, 23F
推
03/12 22:14, , 24F
03/12 22:14, 24F
→
03/12 22:14, , 25F
03/12 22:14, 25F
推
03/12 22:15, , 26F
03/12 22:15, 26F
→
03/12 22:16, , 27F
03/12 22:16, 27F
→
03/12 22:16, , 28F
03/12 22:16, 28F
→
03/12 22:16, , 29F
03/12 22:16, 29F
→
03/12 22:17, , 30F
03/12 22:17, 30F
推
03/12 22:20, , 31F
03/12 22:20, 31F
推
03/12 22:32, , 32F
03/12 22:32, 32F
→
03/12 22:38, , 33F
03/12 22:38, 33F
→
03/12 22:39, , 34F
03/12 22:39, 34F
→
03/12 22:41, , 35F
03/12 22:41, 35F
→
03/12 22:41, , 36F
03/12 22:41, 36F
推
03/12 22:42, , 37F
03/12 22:42, 37F
→
03/12 22:44, , 38F
03/12 22:44, 38F
推
03/12 23:01, , 39F
03/12 23:01, 39F
推
03/12 23:05, , 40F
03/12 23:05, 40F
→
03/12 23:05, , 41F
03/12 23:05, 41F
推
03/12 23:10, , 42F
03/12 23:10, 42F
→
03/12 23:10, , 43F
03/12 23:10, 43F
→
03/12 23:13, , 44F
03/12 23:13, 44F
推
03/12 23:19, , 45F
03/12 23:19, 45F
推
03/12 23:22, , 46F
03/12 23:22, 46F
→
03/12 23:23, , 47F
03/12 23:23, 47F
推
03/12 23:36, , 48F
03/12 23:36, 48F
→
03/12 23:46, , 49F
03/12 23:46, 49F
推
03/13 01:28, , 50F
03/13 01:28, 50F
→
03/13 01:28, , 51F
03/13 01:28, 51F
推
03/13 03:48, , 52F
03/13 03:48, 52F
→
03/13 03:48, , 53F
03/13 03:48, 53F
→
03/13 03:49, , 54F
03/13 03:49, 54F
推
03/13 04:04, , 55F
03/13 04:04, 55F
→
03/13 09:18, , 56F
03/13 09:18, 56F
推
03/13 12:14, , 57F
03/13 12:14, 57F
→
03/13 12:14, , 58F
03/13 12:14, 58F
→
03/13 12:14, , 59F
03/13 12:14, 59F
→
03/13 12:14, , 60F
03/13 12:14, 60F
→
03/13 12:14, , 61F
03/13 12:14, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):