[閒聊] 無法接受、疑似有被洗白的角色已回收
大家認為洗白最勉強的角色是?
有些作品會利用大魔王過去的悲慘故事
作為他/她後來大屠殺的理由,
有時甚至大魔王屠殺的人,根本就不是當初欺負大魔王的那些人。
(此處洗白的定義以大家自己的定義為主)
在這樣的前因後果下,"有些人"認為作者有在對這個角色進行"洗白"的動作。
有些人對大魔王產生同情,認為魔王屠殺人類是對的。
有些人認為無論再怎麼洗,小時候受到的虐待喪親等,與後來的殺戮是2回事。
頂多同情,但離原諒有段距離。
不知道大家認為在作品中有出現疑似洗白的劇情,
但洗白最勉強(或雖有洗白但仍無法接受) 的角色有誰? (動畫跟漫畫)
PS 說不定會出現豆之助? ~(°□ 。)~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.240.43.154
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1487686996.A.73D.html
→
02/21 22:27, , 1F
02/21 22:27, 1F
→
02/21 22:27, , 2F
02/21 22:27, 2F
→
02/21 22:28, , 3F
02/21 22:28, 3F
推
02/21 22:29, , 4F
02/21 22:29, 4F
推
02/21 22:30, , 5F
02/21 22:30, 5F
→
02/21 22:30, , 6F
02/21 22:30, 6F
這作品我沒很熟 不過有印象他殺了一堆女主角分身?
不過感覺支持度還是很高 不知道是不是因為殺那麼多人是必要或是正義的?
→
02/21 22:31, , 7F
02/21 22:31, 7F
旋風管家? 等等應該是食戟?
推
02/21 22:31, , 8F
02/21 22:31, 8F
推
02/21 22:32, , 9F
02/21 22:32, 9F
→
02/21 22:32, , 10F
02/21 22:32, 10F
推
02/21 22:34, , 11F
02/21 22:34, 11F
推
02/21 22:35, , 12F
02/21 22:35, 12F
推
02/21 22:36, , 13F
02/21 22:36, 13F
推
02/21 22:38, , 14F
02/21 22:38, 14F
推
02/21 22:41, , 15F
02/21 22:41, 15F
→
02/21 22:44, , 16F
02/21 22:44, 16F
→
02/21 22:44, , 17F
02/21 22:44, 17F
沒一個壞人 感覺h大所說這種"每個壞人都有自己的故事"這種趨勢流行好一段時間了
(不過小時候看作品真的就直接壞到爆
→
02/21 22:45, , 18F
02/21 22:45, 18F
→
02/21 22:46, , 19F
02/21 22:46, 19F
推
02/21 22:46, , 20F
02/21 22:46, 20F
推
02/21 22:48, , 21F
02/21 22:48, 21F
→
02/21 22:48, , 22F
02/21 22:48, 22F
推
02/21 22:56, , 23F
02/21 22:56, 23F
→
02/21 22:57, , 24F
02/21 22:57, 24F
還有人記得這部前幾話神作 太感動了XD
推
02/21 22:59, , 25F
02/21 22:59, 25F
推
02/21 23:00, , 26F
02/21 23:00, 26F
推
02/21 23:00, , 27F
02/21 23:00, 27F
推
02/21 23:01, , 28F
02/21 23:01, 28F
※ 編輯: rubric (111.240.43.154), 02/21/2017 23:03:54
推
02/21 23:05, , 29F
02/21 23:05, 29F
→
02/21 23:06, , 30F
02/21 23:06, 30F
推
02/21 23:10, , 31F
02/21 23:10, 31F
推
02/21 23:13, , 32F
02/21 23:13, 32F
→
02/21 23:14, , 33F
02/21 23:14, 33F
推
02/21 23:26, , 34F
02/21 23:26, 34F
推
02/21 23:28, , 35F
02/21 23:28, 35F
推
02/21 23:35, , 36F
02/21 23:35, 36F
推
02/21 23:41, , 37F
02/21 23:41, 37F
推
02/21 23:46, , 38F
02/21 23:46, 38F
推
02/21 23:56, , 39F
02/21 23:56, 39F
→
02/21 23:57, , 40F
02/21 23:57, 40F
推
02/22 00:03, , 41F
02/22 00:03, 41F
→
02/22 00:04, , 42F
02/22 00:04, 42F
→
02/22 00:05, , 43F
02/22 00:05, 43F
→
02/22 00:05, , 44F
02/22 00:05, 44F
→
02/22 00:06, , 45F
02/22 00:06, 45F
→
02/22 00:07, , 46F
02/22 00:07, 46F
推
02/22 00:15, , 47F
02/22 00:15, 47F
推
02/22 00:31, , 48F
02/22 00:31, 48F
推
02/22 01:46, , 49F
02/22 01:46, 49F
推
02/22 02:45, , 50F
02/22 02:45, 50F
推
02/22 04:00, , 51F
02/22 04:00, 51F
推
02/22 04:12, , 52F
02/22 04:12, 52F
推
02/22 04:48, , 53F
02/22 04:48, 53F
推
02/22 08:01, , 54F
02/22 08:01, 54F
推
02/22 08:13, , 55F
02/22 08:13, 55F
推
02/22 11:05, , 56F
02/22 11:05, 56F
推
02/22 12:00, , 57F
02/22 12:00, 57F
推
02/22 13:52, , 58F
02/22 13:52, 58F
推
02/22 22:49, , 59F
02/22 22:49, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):