[閒聊] 大家覺得獵命師傳奇有沒有價值動畫化?已回收
先不談作者風評如何
我認為獵命師傳奇情節算是十分精彩
有戀愛情節 也有賣肉的腳色可以出場
十分符合日本動畫該有的要素
如果獵命師傳奇是日本人寫的 有沒有機會被動畫化呢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.69.208
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1469791033.A.613.html
→
07/29 19:17, , 1F
07/29 19:17, 1F
長篇小說難逃爛尾的命運QQ
※ 編輯: qscf753 (122.116.69.208), 07/29/2016 19:18:32
→
07/29 19:18, , 2F
07/29 19:18, 2F
→
07/29 19:18, , 3F
07/29 19:18, 3F
→
07/29 19:18, , 4F
07/29 19:18, 4F
推
07/29 19:18, , 5F
07/29 19:18, 5F
→
07/29 19:18, , 6F
07/29 19:18, 6F
→
07/29 19:19, , 7F
07/29 19:19, 7F
→
07/29 19:19, , 8F
07/29 19:19, 8F
→
07/29 19:19, , 9F
07/29 19:19, 9F
→
07/29 19:20, , 10F
07/29 19:20, 10F
中間哪邊崩了 我覺得徐福的伏筆鋪得很好阿
推
07/29 19:20, , 11F
07/29 19:20, 11F
※ 編輯: qscf753 (122.116.69.208), 07/29/2016 19:20:56
→
07/29 19:20, , 12F
07/29 19:20, 12F
→
07/29 19:20, , 13F
07/29 19:20, 13F
推
07/29 19:20, , 14F
07/29 19:20, 14F
其實光是爛尾的話 日本動畫也一堆爛尾的 爛尾也還好吧 中間精彩就好
z組織到最後是爆走得滿誇張的
但我覺得這種沒有浮上檯面的反派
讓一般的rpg的兩方對抗變成三方對抗十分不錯
雖然後面的結局大概怎麼圓都會很牽強啦
→
07/29 19:20, , 15F
07/29 19:20, 15F
→
07/29 19:20, , 16F
07/29 19:20, 16F
→
07/29 19:20, , 17F
07/29 19:20, 17F
推
07/29 19:20, , 18F
07/29 19:20, 18F
推
07/29 19:21, , 19F
07/29 19:21, 19F
→
07/29 19:21, , 20F
07/29 19:21, 20F
→
07/29 19:21, , 21F
07/29 19:21, 21F
推
07/29 19:21, , 22F
07/29 19:21, 22F
→
07/29 19:21, , 23F
07/29 19:21, 23F
推
07/29 19:22, , 24F
07/29 19:22, 24F
推
07/29 19:22, , 25F
07/29 19:22, 25F
※ 編輯: qscf753 (122.116.69.208), 07/29/2016 19:28:54
→
07/29 19:25, , 26F
07/29 19:25, 26F
推
07/29 19:25, , 27F
07/29 19:25, 27F
→
07/29 19:25, , 28F
07/29 19:25, 28F
→
07/29 19:25, , 29F
07/29 19:25, 29F
→
07/29 19:25, , 30F
07/29 19:25, 30F
推
07/29 19:26, , 31F
07/29 19:26, 31F
推
07/29 19:26, , 32F
07/29 19:26, 32F
推
07/29 19:28, , 33F
07/29 19:28, 33F
其實天才亂鬥就跟沒有天才差不多...吧!?
不過以故事的角度角色太多有點浮濫是沒錯
還有 59 則推文
還有 7 段內文
→
07/29 20:09, , 93F
07/29 20:09, 93F
→
07/29 20:10, , 94F
07/29 20:10, 94F
推
07/29 20:11, , 95F
07/29 20:11, 95F
推
07/29 20:12, , 96F
07/29 20:12, 96F
推
07/29 20:12, , 97F
07/29 20:12, 97F
推
07/29 20:14, , 98F
07/29 20:14, 98F
→
07/29 20:14, , 99F
07/29 20:14, 99F
→
07/29 20:15, , 100F
07/29 20:15, 100F
→
07/29 20:18, , 101F
07/29 20:18, 101F
→
07/29 20:19, , 102F
07/29 20:19, 102F
→
07/29 20:27, , 103F
07/29 20:27, 103F
推
07/29 20:35, , 104F
07/29 20:35, 104F
→
07/29 20:35, , 105F
07/29 20:35, 105F
推
07/29 20:47, , 106F
07/29 20:47, 106F
推
07/29 20:58, , 107F
07/29 20:58, 107F
→
07/29 21:07, , 108F
07/29 21:07, 108F
→
07/29 21:26, , 109F
07/29 21:26, 109F
→
07/29 21:28, , 110F
07/29 21:28, 110F
推
07/29 21:35, , 111F
07/29 21:35, 111F
推
07/29 21:37, , 112F
07/29 21:37, 112F
推
07/29 22:02, , 113F
07/29 22:02, 113F
推
07/29 22:05, , 114F
07/29 22:05, 114F
推
07/29 22:06, , 115F
07/29 22:06, 115F
推
07/29 22:22, , 116F
07/29 22:22, 116F
→
07/29 23:07, , 117F
07/29 23:07, 117F
→
07/29 23:07, , 118F
07/29 23:07, 118F
→
07/30 01:25, , 119F
07/30 01:25, 119F
→
07/30 01:42, , 120F
07/30 01:42, 120F
→
07/30 01:42, , 121F
07/30 01:42, 121F
推
07/30 09:06, , 122F
07/30 09:06, 122F
推
07/30 09:09, , 123F
07/30 09:09, 123F
→
07/30 09:09, , 124F
07/30 09:09, 124F
推
07/30 11:45, , 125F
07/30 11:45, 125F
→
07/30 11:45, , 126F
07/30 11:45, 126F
推
07/30 12:28, , 127F
07/30 12:28, 127F
→
08/11 14:14, , 128F
08/11 14:14, 128F
→
08/11 14:19, , 129F
08/11 14:19, 129F
推
08/11 14:31, , 130F
08/11 14:31, 130F
推
08/11 14:44, , 131F
08/11 14:44, 131F
推
08/11 16:43, , 132F
08/11 16:43, 132F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):