[閒聊] 麻枝准為什麼那麼堅持要灑狗血已回收
如題
最近回頭看Kanon Clannad
日常校園的笑料在現在看起來依舊很不錯R
各種惡搞冷笑話梗 中間插一點搞笑回
演出還比現在一堆校園番在那整天硬湊什麼歪梗好笑多了
然後麻枝准很愛棒球回可能是通病
不過其實像Clannad的棒球回就作的很有趣
也沒說真的很差啦 (還是說這是京阿尼魔改?)
反而像Kanon中間寫出一堆怪病 還有After Story...
前世輪迴精神體動物的報恩神奇怪病失憶絕症
還是收集光玉回溯轉生上天堂下地獄什麼的
看第一次還有點感動 後面多來幾次根本無感
感覺麻枝准的編劇作日常番蠻有潛力的
為什麼一定要灑狗血?
--
標題 Re: [閒聊] 獵人 354 情報 看板《C_Chat》
推
05/20 19:22,
05/20 19:22
推
05/20 19:23,
05/20 19:23
推
05/20 19:24,
05/20 19:24
→
05/20 19:28,
05/20 19:28
推
05/20 19:30,
05/20 19:30
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.162.68.200
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1464612495.A.F01.html
推
05/30 20:48, , 1F
05/30 20:48, 1F
如果編的好笑我會看啦...偏偏除了Clannad的棒球回夠好笑其他根本是為打而打
推
05/30 20:49, , 2F
05/30 20:49, 2F
所以我不看三立八點檔啊 根本停止思考降低智商
推
05/30 20:49, , 3F
05/30 20:49, 3F
推
05/30 20:49, , 4F
05/30 20:49, 4F
推
05/30 20:51, , 5F
05/30 20:51, 5F
→
05/30 20:51, , 6F
05/30 20:51, 6F
→
05/30 20:51, , 7F
05/30 20:51, 7F
※ 編輯: et310 (1.162.68.200), 05/30/2016 20:53:16
→
05/30 20:51, , 8F
05/30 20:51, 8F
你是指最近夏洛特訪問那篇?
推
05/30 20:54, , 9F
05/30 20:54, 9F
我是看到有人說要死就不太想看了 太狗血
推
05/30 20:55, , 10F
05/30 20:55, 10F
沒跑過遊戲 不過動畫演起來真的很狗血
→
05/30 20:55, , 11F
05/30 20:55, 11F
推
05/30 20:56, , 12F
05/30 20:56, 12F
推
05/30 20:56, , 13F
05/30 20:56, 13F
→
05/30 20:57, , 14F
05/30 20:57, 14F
→
05/30 20:57, , 15F
05/30 20:57, 15F
※ 編輯: et310 (1.162.68.200), 05/30/2016 21:01:31
推
05/30 21:00, , 16F
05/30 21:00, 16F
→
05/30 21:05, , 17F
05/30 21:05, 17F
推
05/30 21:08, , 18F
05/30 21:08, 18F
推
05/30 21:09, , 19F
05/30 21:09, 19F
推
05/30 21:12, , 20F
05/30 21:12, 20F
→
05/30 21:15, , 21F
05/30 21:15, 21F
→
05/30 21:15, , 22F
05/30 21:15, 22F
→
05/30 21:15, , 23F
05/30 21:15, 23F
→
05/30 21:16, , 24F
05/30 21:16, 24F
推
05/30 21:17, , 25F
05/30 21:17, 25F
→
05/30 21:18, , 26F
05/30 21:18, 26F
推
05/30 21:20, , 27F
05/30 21:20, 27F

→
05/30 21:20, , 28F
05/30 21:20, 28F
→
05/30 21:21, , 29F
05/30 21:21, 29F
→
05/30 21:22, , 30F
05/30 21:22, 30F
推
05/30 21:23, , 31F
05/30 21:23, 31F
推
05/30 21:24, , 32F
05/30 21:24, 32F
→
05/30 21:25, , 33F
05/30 21:25, 33F
推
05/30 21:27, , 34F
05/30 21:27, 34F
→
05/30 21:27, , 35F
05/30 21:27, 35F
→
05/30 21:29, , 36F
05/30 21:29, 36F
→
05/30 21:30, , 37F
05/30 21:30, 37F
推
05/30 21:31, , 38F
05/30 21:31, 38F
推
05/30 21:35, , 39F
05/30 21:35, 39F
→
05/30 21:35, , 40F
05/30 21:35, 40F
推
05/30 21:44, , 41F
05/30 21:44, 41F
推
05/30 21:51, , 42F
05/30 21:51, 42F
→
05/30 21:51, , 43F
05/30 21:51, 43F
推
05/30 21:57, , 44F
05/30 21:57, 44F
→
05/30 21:58, , 45F
05/30 21:58, 45F
→
05/30 21:58, , 46F
05/30 21:58, 46F
→
05/30 21:59, , 47F
05/30 21:59, 47F
→
05/30 22:01, , 48F
05/30 22:01, 48F
→
05/30 22:03, , 49F
05/30 22:03, 49F
推
05/30 22:13, , 50F
05/30 22:13, 50F
推
05/30 22:21, , 51F
05/30 22:21, 51F
→
05/30 22:21, , 52F
05/30 22:21, 52F
推
05/31 00:11, , 53F
05/31 00:11, 53F
推
05/31 00:44, , 54F
05/31 00:44, 54F
→
05/31 07:13, , 55F
05/31 07:13, 55F
→
05/31 11:13, , 56F
05/31 11:13, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):