[討論] 為美好世界獻上祝福 和 無彩限幻影世界已回收
我很想說 其實
這兩部本質差不多
別急著噓 以下分析
1.都是單元劇:無彩限到目前為止都在人物介紹,不然就是單一事件
美好世界也是一集一事件 慢慢介紹出場人物
2.主軸不明:美好世界說要打大魔王 有說等於沒說 目前也沒大進展
無彩限要探究怪靈以及世界的秘密 也是整天打小怪
當然 我們都知道美好世界搞笑太厲害了 無彩限蠻無聊的(乾脆叫無聊限)
我承認美好世界的確很好笑,但卻少了韻味
(很難形容 好的像驚爆危機校園篇 普通的至少也有瀨戶花嫁的程度)
美好世界卻稍嫌老套 每集後面都是男主:啊!有這群豆逼,冒險生活怎麼過的感嘆
而
無彩限同樣也沒韻味,但人家有賣萌啊 美好世界賣萌比不過京阿尼的
一個搞笑勝 一個賣萌勝
本質卻是一樣的
以上單從動畫討論 如果小說怎樣怎樣也請海涵!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.161.56.214
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1456068194.A.92C.html
→
02/21 23:25, , 1F
02/21 23:25, 1F
→
02/21 23:25, , 2F
02/21 23:25, 2F
→
02/21 23:25, , 3F
02/21 23:25, 3F
→
02/21 23:25, , 4F
02/21 23:25, 4F
→
02/21 23:25, , 5F
02/21 23:25, 5F
推
02/21 23:25, , 6F
02/21 23:25, 6F
→
02/21 23:26, , 7F
02/21 23:26, 7F
這誤會了 是說搞笑沒啥韻味 當然這是個人觀點 我對美好世界的評價是高過無彩限的
光是搞笑就打趴了 只是細究發現本質差不多 想分享罷了
推
02/21 23:26, , 8F
02/21 23:26, 8F
→
02/21 23:26, , 9F
02/21 23:26, 9F
推
02/21 23:26, , 10F
02/21 23:26, 10F
→
02/21 23:26, , 11F
02/21 23:26, 11F
並非如此 我是說只有這兩部的架構差不多
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.56.214), 02/21/2016 23:29:45
推
02/21 23:27, , 12F
02/21 23:27, 12F
→
02/21 23:27, , 13F
02/21 23:27, 13F
→
02/21 23:28, , 14F
02/21 23:28, 14F
推
02/21 23:28, , 15F
02/21 23:28, 15F
推
02/21 23:28, , 16F
02/21 23:28, 16F
推
02/21 23:28, , 17F
02/21 23:28, 17F
→
02/21 23:28, , 18F
02/21 23:28, 18F
→
02/21 23:28, , 19F
02/21 23:28, 19F
→
02/21 23:28, , 20F
02/21 23:28, 20F
推
02/21 23:28, , 21F
02/21 23:28, 21F
→
02/21 23:28, , 22F
02/21 23:28, 22F
推
02/21 23:29, , 23F
02/21 23:29, 23F
因為當下看很好笑看完後卻有空虛感 少了某些回味吧
推
02/21 23:29, , 24F
02/21 23:29, 24F
推
02/21 23:30, , 25F
02/21 23:30, 25F
推
02/21 23:30, , 26F
02/21 23:30, 26F
→
02/21 23:30, , 27F
02/21 23:30, 27F
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.56.214), 02/21/2016 23:32:32
推
02/21 23:32, , 28F
02/21 23:32, 28F
推
02/21 23:32, , 29F
02/21 23:32, 29F
推
02/21 23:32, , 30F
02/21 23:32, 30F
→
02/21 23:32, , 31F
02/21 23:32, 31F
推
02/21 23:33, , 32F
02/21 23:33, 32F
→
02/21 23:33, , 33F
02/21 23:33, 33F
→
02/21 23:33, , 34F
02/21 23:33, 34F
推
02/21 23:33, , 35F
02/21 23:33, 35F
推
02/21 23:33, , 36F
02/21 23:33, 36F
→
02/21 23:34, , 37F
02/21 23:34, 37F
推
02/21 23:34, , 38F
02/21 23:34, 38F
對!就是這個 明明本質差不多 因為整體表現差太多導致人氣差距越來越大
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.56.214), 02/21/2016 23:35:54
→
02/21 23:35, , 39F
02/21 23:35, 39F
→
02/21 23:36, , 40F
02/21 23:36, 40F
→
02/21 23:36, , 41F
02/21 23:36, 41F
→
02/21 23:36, , 42F
02/21 23:36, 42F
→
02/21 23:36, , 43F
02/21 23:36, 43F
→
02/21 23:37, , 44F
02/21 23:37, 44F
→
02/21 23:37, , 45F
02/21 23:37, 45F
推
02/21 23:37, , 46F
02/21 23:37, 46F
→
02/21 23:37, , 47F
02/21 23:37, 47F
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.56.214), 02/21/2016 23:39:21
推
02/21 23:38, , 48F
02/21 23:38, 48F
推
02/21 23:38, , 49F
02/21 23:38, 49F
推
02/21 23:38, , 50F
02/21 23:38, 50F
→
02/21 23:39, , 51F
02/21 23:39, 51F
→
02/21 23:40, , 52F
02/21 23:40, 52F
→
02/21 23:41, , 53F
02/21 23:41, 53F
推
02/21 23:42, , 54F
02/21 23:42, 54F
→
02/21 23:43, , 55F
02/21 23:43, 55F
好吧 其實他的搞笑不錯但總少了什麼 這才是我想說的 內文改正
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.56.214), 02/21/2016 23:45:43
推
02/21 23:47, , 56F
02/21 23:47, 56F
推
02/21 23:47, , 57F
02/21 23:47, 57F
→
02/21 23:48, , 58F
02/21 23:48, 58F
→
02/21 23:48, , 59F
02/21 23:48, 59F
→
02/21 23:49, , 60F
02/21 23:49, 60F
推
02/21 23:50, , 61F
02/21 23:50, 61F
推
02/21 23:53, , 62F
02/21 23:53, 62F
→
02/21 23:53, , 63F
02/21 23:53, 63F
→
02/21 23:59, , 64F
02/21 23:59, 64F
好兇好兇 的確 沒對到口味 所以打算用另一角度看 看來沒人認同啊
美好世界>>>>>>>>>無聊限也是肯定的
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.56.214), 02/22/2016 00:04:35
推
02/22 00:02, , 65F
02/22 00:02, 65F
→
02/22 00:02, , 66F
02/22 00:02, 66F
→
02/22 00:09, , 67F
02/22 00:09, 67F
→
02/22 00:10, , 68F
02/22 00:10, 68F
→
02/22 00:10, , 69F
02/22 00:10, 69F
→
02/22 00:11, , 70F
02/22 00:11, 70F
推
02/22 00:13, , 71F
02/22 00:13, 71F
推
02/22 00:42, , 72F
02/22 00:42, 72F
→
02/22 00:43, , 73F
02/22 00:43, 73F
→
02/22 00:54, , 74F
02/22 00:54, 74F
推
02/22 00:54, , 75F
02/22 00:54, 75F
→
02/22 00:55, , 76F
02/22 00:55, 76F
→
02/22 00:55, , 77F
02/22 00:55, 77F
推
02/22 01:01, , 78F
02/22 01:01, 78F
→
02/22 01:02, , 79F
02/22 01:02, 79F
推
02/22 01:09, , 80F
02/22 01:09, 80F
推
02/22 01:43, , 81F
02/22 01:43, 81F
→
02/22 02:37, , 82F
02/22 02:37, 82F
→
02/22 04:30, , 83F
02/22 04:30, 83F
→
02/22 04:30, , 84F
02/22 04:30, 84F
→
02/22 04:33, , 85F
02/22 04:33, 85F
→
02/22 04:33, , 86F
02/22 04:33, 86F
→
02/22 04:33, , 87F
02/22 04:33, 87F
推
02/22 09:04, , 88F
02/22 09:04, 88F
→
02/22 09:48, , 89F
02/22 09:48, 89F
→
02/22 11:40, , 90F
02/22 11:40, 90F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):