[閒聊] 切嗣為什麼排擠SABER?(FATE雷)已回收
在第四次、第五次戰中,扣除外掛的金閃閃,SABER戰力絕對是冠軍後選
第四次可以單挑掉藍斯洛特,也可以用咖哩棒轟掉牛車跟CASTER
第五次中也可以單挑掉小次郎、RIDER,也可以用咖哩棒轟掉B叔
唯一沒取得明顯對戰優勢的,大概是幸運E的雙槍
作為SABER的MASTER,就戰力上,切嗣應該沒有不滿才對?
還是因為SABER是女性,切嗣排擠霸凌SABER了?
(SABER在F/Z中偏向中性,不知道是不是為了避免被切嗣排擠...)
不然當SABER可以隨便用咖哩棒時,真的很難找到可以抗衡的對手...
--
是說,不知道SABER在UBW中,有沒有稍微原諒切嗣了...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.34.203.219
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1443508730.A.87B.html
→
09/29 14:39, , 1F
09/29 14:39, 1F
推
09/29 14:40, , 2F
09/29 14:40, 2F
推
09/29 14:40, , 3F
09/29 14:40, 3F
推
09/29 14:40, , 4F
09/29 14:40, 4F
推
09/29 14:40, , 5F
09/29 14:40, 5F
→
09/29 14:40, , 6F
09/29 14:40, 6F
→
09/29 14:41, , 7F
09/29 14:41, 7F
→
09/29 14:41, , 8F
09/29 14:41, 8F
推
09/29 14:41, , 9F
09/29 14:41, 9F
推
09/29 14:42, , 10F
09/29 14:42, 10F
→
09/29 14:42, , 11F
09/29 14:42, 11F
→
09/29 14:42, , 12F
09/29 14:42, 12F
→
09/29 14:43, , 13F
09/29 14:43, 13F
推
09/29 14:43, , 14F
09/29 14:43, 14F
→
09/29 14:43, , 15F
09/29 14:43, 15F
→
09/29 14:44, , 16F
09/29 14:44, 16F
推
09/29 14:44, , 17F
09/29 14:44, 17F
推
09/29 14:46, , 18F
09/29 14:46, 18F
推
09/29 14:47, , 19F
09/29 14:47, 19F
推
09/29 14:47, , 20F
09/29 14:47, 20F
推
09/29 14:47, , 21F
09/29 14:47, 21F
→
09/29 14:48, , 22F
09/29 14:48, 22F
推
09/29 14:49, , 23F
09/29 14:49, 23F
推
09/29 14:49, , 24F
09/29 14:49, 24F
推
09/29 14:50, , 25F
09/29 14:50, 25F
→
09/29 14:50, , 26F
09/29 14:50, 26F
→
09/29 14:50, , 27F
09/29 14:50, 27F
推
09/29 14:50, , 28F
09/29 14:50, 28F
推
09/29 14:51, , 29F
09/29 14:51, 29F
推
09/29 14:52, , 30F
09/29 14:52, 30F
推
09/29 14:52, , 31F
09/29 14:52, 31F
→
09/29 14:52, , 32F
09/29 14:52, 32F
就看切嗣裱完教授後那段
其實SABER本身應該對切嗣不至於到討厭地步...?
畢竟切嗣也是在追求所有人幸福的理想 (畢竟是土狼的夢想原形)
SABER本身也看出切嗣在追求夢想的過程中所承受的巨大苦痛
越想救人,卻越要殺人..
→
09/29 14:56, , 33F
09/29 14:56, 33F
※ 編輯: namdoogmi (1.34.203.219), 09/29/2015 14:58:22
→
09/29 15:12, , 34F
09/29 15:12, 34F
推
09/29 15:13, , 35F
09/29 15:13, 35F
推
09/29 15:14, , 36F
09/29 15:14, 36F
推
09/29 15:15, , 37F
09/29 15:15, 37F
推
09/29 15:16, , 38F
09/29 15:16, 38F
推
09/29 15:16, , 39F
09/29 15:16, 39F
→
09/29 15:16, , 40F
09/29 15:16, 40F
→
09/29 15:16, , 41F
09/29 15:16, 41F
→
09/29 15:16, , 42F
09/29 15:16, 42F
→
09/29 15:16, , 43F
09/29 15:16, 43F
→
09/29 15:16, , 44F
09/29 15:16, 44F
→
09/29 15:16, , 45F
09/29 15:16, 45F
→
09/29 15:26, , 46F
09/29 15:26, 46F
推
09/29 15:29, , 47F
09/29 15:29, 47F
→
09/29 15:37, , 48F
09/29 15:37, 48F
→
09/29 15:40, , 49F
09/29 15:40, 49F
推
09/29 15:50, , 50F
09/29 15:50, 50F
→
09/29 15:50, , 51F
09/29 15:50, 51F
推
09/29 16:00, , 52F
09/29 16:00, 52F
→
09/29 16:00, , 53F
09/29 16:00, 53F
推
09/29 16:08, , 54F
09/29 16:08, 54F
推
09/29 16:14, , 55F
09/29 16:14, 55F
→
09/29 16:14, , 56F
09/29 16:14, 56F
→
09/29 16:14, , 57F
09/29 16:14, 57F
→
09/29 16:14, , 58F
09/29 16:14, 58F
推
09/29 16:19, , 59F
09/29 16:19, 59F
→
09/29 16:25, , 60F
09/29 16:25, 60F
→
09/29 16:25, , 61F
09/29 16:25, 61F
→
09/29 16:28, , 62F
09/29 16:28, 62F
→
09/29 16:28, , 63F
09/29 16:28, 63F
→
09/29 16:28, , 64F
09/29 16:28, 64F
→
09/29 16:32, , 65F
09/29 16:32, 65F
→
09/29 16:36, , 66F
09/29 16:36, 66F
推
09/29 16:36, , 67F
09/29 16:36, 67F
→
09/29 16:37, , 68F
09/29 16:37, 68F
→
09/29 16:37, , 69F
09/29 16:37, 69F
→
09/29 16:37, , 70F
09/29 16:37, 70F
→
09/29 16:38, , 71F
09/29 16:38, 71F
→
09/29 16:39, , 72F
09/29 16:39, 72F
→
09/29 17:25, , 73F
09/29 17:25, 73F
→
09/29 17:25, , 74F
09/29 17:25, 74F
推
09/29 17:48, , 75F
09/29 17:48, 75F
→
09/29 19:11, , 76F
09/29 19:11, 76F
推
09/29 19:18, , 77F
09/29 19:18, 77F
推
09/29 19:28, , 78F
09/29 19:28, 78F
→
09/29 20:17, , 79F
09/29 20:17, 79F
→
09/29 20:18, , 80F
09/29 20:18, 80F
推
09/29 21:10, , 81F
09/29 21:10, 81F
推
09/29 21:23, , 82F
09/29 21:23, 82F
推
09/29 22:33, , 83F
09/29 22:33, 83F
→
09/30 02:16, , 84F
09/30 02:16, 84F
→
09/30 16:58, , 85F
09/30 16:58, 85F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):