Re: [閒聊] PVC最好不要用IKEA櫃收藏已回收
剛好家中剛買書架
而老爸又是木工科的,所以來回一下
-----------------------------------------------------------
基本上,木板分為從材質分
實木板、夾板
實木板就是直接實木,沒啥好說的
主要來說夾板
夾板顧名思義
就是兩個板子夾住,但中間夾的是什麼材料就很重要了
像我原本想要在IKEA買的是稱為密集板做的(約3k,長80x寬28x高202
密集板中間的材料為木質纖維及木屑加上黏劑組合而成
重物久壓一定歪
而我之後請我老爸做的是用木心板
中間的材間是實木,外面再用一般板子夾住
優缺點我就不說了,網路上有更詳細的比較
直接說價錢差
也是花3K,買了兩塊4尺 X 8尺的木心板(感謝mikemai0080更正
做出來的長寬高跟傢俱行賣的差不多,但做了2個半!
你沒看錯,2個半!(那半個是小書櫃
想想省下來的錢,都可以在買一支模型了喔~
小提醒:
自己做要考慮木紋受力情形(縱向、橫向
所以請店家裁切時要注意,方向若是搞錯了,能承受的力量就不一樣了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 117.56.148.73
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1442764182.A.DD7.html
推
09/20 23:51, , 1F
09/20 23:51, 1F
推
09/20 23:51, , 2F
09/20 23:51, 2F
推
09/20 23:52, , 3F
09/20 23:52, 3F
從IKEA買回來還不是要自己DIY…
真的要來DIY就直接從木板開始!
然後在買的時候就直接請老闆切好大小(木材行都會有專業工具,快、狠、準
之後去買螺絲釘,旋上就好了
仔細想想,後半部不就是從IKEA買回來後,要做的事嗎……
※ 編輯: RoaringWolf (117.56.148.73), 09/20/2015 23:56:20
→
09/20 23:53, , 4F
09/20 23:53, 4F
推
09/20 23:53, , 5F
09/20 23:53, 5F
忘了……厚度好像是13mm,幾分幾分我不會算XDDD
→
09/20 23:54, , 6F
09/20 23:54, 6F
推
09/20 23:55, , 7F
09/20 23:55, 7F
我不認為IKEA的會比較耐……
→
09/20 23:55, , 8F
09/20 23:55, 8F
推
09/20 23:56, , 9F
09/20 23:56, 9F
花生,你突破盲腸了
※ 編輯: RoaringWolf (117.56.148.73), 09/21/2015 00:00:03
→
09/20 23:57, , 10F
09/20 23:57, 10F
推
09/20 23:57, , 11F
09/20 23:57, 11F
木心板外面本來就有一層了,不用上漆啊
→
09/20 23:57, , 12F
09/20 23:57, 12F
→
09/20 23:58, , 13F
09/20 23:58, 13F
→
09/20 23:59, , 14F
09/20 23:59, 14F
→
09/21 00:01, , 15F
09/21 00:01, 15F
※ 編輯: RoaringWolf (117.56.148.73), 09/21/2015 00:04:05
推
09/21 00:01, , 16F
09/21 00:01, 16F
→
09/21 00:02, , 17F
09/21 00:02, 17F
推
09/21 00:03, , 18F
09/21 00:03, 18F
→
09/21 00:03, , 19F
09/21 00:03, 19F
啊,好像是吔XDDDDDD,感謝更正
→
09/21 00:04, , 20F
09/21 00:04, 20F
→
09/21 00:04, , 21F
09/21 00:04, 21F
→
09/21 00:04, , 22F
09/21 00:04, 22F
負重多少這我就不知道了,畢竟沒有數據
推
09/21 00:04, , 23F
09/21 00:04, 23F
→
09/21 00:04, , 24F
09/21 00:04, 24F
推
09/21 00:04, , 25F
09/21 00:04, 25F
※ 編輯: RoaringWolf (117.56.148.73), 09/21/2015 00:10:51
---------------------------------------------------------------------
→
09/21 00:05, , 26F
09/21 00:05, 26F
---------------------------------------------------------------------
感覺這句話是重點啊
→
09/21 00:05, , 27F
09/21 00:05, 27F
→
09/21 00:05, , 28F
09/21 00:05, 28F
推
09/21 00:06, , 29F
09/21 00:06, 29F
推
09/21 00:08, , 30F
09/21 00:08, 30F
不知道吔,沒問
不過,強度一樣,可能差不了多少(不負責任發言
推
09/21 00:09, , 31F
09/21 00:09, 31F
→
09/21 00:10, , 32F
09/21 00:10, 32F
→
09/21 00:10, , 33F
09/21 00:10, 33F
→
09/21 00:11, , 34F
09/21 00:11, 34F
→
09/21 00:11, , 35F
09/21 00:11, 35F
→
09/21 00:11, , 36F
09/21 00:11, 36F
→
09/21 00:12, , 37F
09/21 00:12, 37F
→
09/21 00:12, , 38F
09/21 00:12, 38F
→
09/21 00:13, , 39F
09/21 00:13, 39F
→
09/21 00:14, , 40F
09/21 00:14, 40F
※ 編輯: RoaringWolf (117.56.148.73), 09/21/2015 00:19:51
推
09/21 00:15, , 41F
09/21 00:15, 41F
→
09/21 00:17, , 42F
09/21 00:17, 42F
→
09/21 00:21, , 43F
09/21 00:21, 43F
→
09/21 00:22, , 44F
09/21 00:22, 44F
→
09/21 00:22, , 45F
09/21 00:22, 45F
推
09/21 00:22, , 46F
09/21 00:22, 46F
推
09/21 00:24, , 47F
09/21 00:24, 47F
推
09/21 00:32, , 48F
09/21 00:32, 48F
推
09/21 00:38, , 49F
09/21 00:38, 49F
→
09/21 00:38, , 50F
09/21 00:38, 50F
推
09/21 00:57, , 51F
09/21 00:57, 51F
→
09/21 00:57, , 52F
09/21 00:57, 52F
推
09/21 01:34, , 53F
09/21 01:34, 53F
→
09/21 01:34, , 54F
09/21 01:34, 54F
推
09/21 09:32, , 55F
09/21 09:32, 55F
→
09/21 09:35, , 56F
09/21 09:35, 56F
→
09/21 09:38, , 57F
09/21 09:38, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):