[閒聊] 後宮類主角會不會被罵渣的區別已回收
看到有人聊一條垃與山田接吻魔為何一個是渣一個不是
就想了一下自己不罵後宮主角渣的標準
1.後宮承諾
只要真給出後宮承諾.那開後宮就沒問題.畢竟那是女主角們自己的選擇
例:KEY君.護堂.乳龍帝
2.真專情
很多後宮作是單女角走向.男主是真的專情一人.還是對眾女角餵而不養.就是人渣之別
例:景太郎.山田接吻魔.綾瀨裕人.不少GAL的男主
3.悲慘度
有些男主會讓人覺得開後宮是合理的補償.真的太可憐了
例:右手哥.甘草奏.津田(快逃).白銀武(A篇).高梨亮(這是女主可憐)
4.世界和平
為了世界和平而開後宮的人.不開後宮世界會很危險(極易發生大規模死傷或世界大戰)
例:五河士道.白鷺姬.蘭斯大王.土見禀
所以一條是垃阿
不給承諾.不專情.也不慘.開後宮一統集英組.蜂巢.警界.叉燒會對世界和平還比較有貢獻
這不渣什麼是渣?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.249.38.56
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1442752236.A.703.html
推
09/20 20:31, , 1F
09/20 20:31, 1F
推
09/20 20:32, , 2F
09/20 20:32, 2F
推
09/20 20:33, , 3F
09/20 20:33, 3F
推
09/20 20:33, , 4F
09/20 20:33, 4F
推
09/20 20:34, , 5F
09/20 20:34, 5F
→
09/20 20:34, , 6F
09/20 20:34, 6F
→
09/20 20:35, , 7F
09/20 20:35, 7F
推
09/20 20:35, , 8F
09/20 20:35, 8F
→
09/20 20:36, , 9F
09/20 20:36, 9F
推
09/20 20:36, , 10F
09/20 20:36, 10F
推
09/20 20:37, , 11F
09/20 20:37, 11F
推
09/20 20:37, , 12F
09/20 20:37, 12F
推
09/20 20:37, , 13F
09/20 20:37, 13F
→
09/20 20:37, , 14F
09/20 20:37, 14F
→
09/20 20:37, , 15F
09/20 20:37, 15F
推
09/20 20:39, , 16F
09/20 20:39, 16F
→
09/20 20:42, , 17F
09/20 20:42, 17F
推
09/20 20:43, , 18F
09/20 20:43, 18F
推
09/20 20:43, , 19F
09/20 20:43, 19F
推
09/20 20:44, , 20F
09/20 20:44, 20F
推
09/20 20:45, , 21F
09/20 20:45, 21F
推
09/20 20:53, , 22F
09/20 20:53, 22F
推
09/20 20:54, , 23F
09/20 20:54, 23F
推
09/20 20:55, , 24F
09/20 20:55, 24F
→
09/20 21:00, , 25F
09/20 21:00, 25F
推
09/20 21:01, , 26F
09/20 21:01, 26F
推
09/20 21:02, , 27F
09/20 21:02, 27F
→
09/20 21:02, , 28F
09/20 21:02, 28F
推
09/20 21:06, , 29F
09/20 21:06, 29F
推
09/20 21:07, , 30F
09/20 21:07, 30F
推
09/20 21:09, , 31F
09/20 21:09, 31F
推
09/20 21:16, , 32F
09/20 21:16, 32F
→
09/20 21:16, , 33F
09/20 21:16, 33F
→
09/20 21:17, , 34F
09/20 21:17, 34F
→
09/20 21:18, , 35F
09/20 21:18, 35F
→
09/20 21:18, , 36F
09/20 21:18, 36F
→
09/20 21:19, , 37F
09/20 21:19, 37F
→
09/20 21:20, , 38F
09/20 21:20, 38F
→
09/20 21:20, , 39F
09/20 21:20, 39F
推
09/20 21:22, , 40F
09/20 21:22, 40F
推
09/20 21:36, , 41F
09/20 21:36, 41F
推
09/20 21:47, , 42F
09/20 21:47, 42F
推
09/20 22:02, , 43F
09/20 22:02, 43F
推
09/20 22:33, , 44F
09/20 22:33, 44F
→
09/20 22:54, , 45F
09/20 22:54, 45F
推
09/20 23:02, , 46F
09/20 23:02, 46F
→
09/20 23:03, , 47F
09/20 23:03, 47F
→
09/20 23:04, , 48F
09/20 23:04, 48F
推
09/21 10:20, , 49F
09/21 10:20, 49F
推
09/21 14:53, , 50F
09/21 14:53, 50F
推
09/21 17:44, , 51F
09/21 17:44, 51F
推
09/21 18:01, , 52F
09/21 18:01, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):