[閒聊] 有沒有配角比主角搶眼的作品?已回收
一般來說主角通常會又帥又猛,簡單來講就是有獨特的魅力
但最近在看飆速宅男這部作品的時候就覺得主角小野田沒有什麼吸引力
反而是配角卷島或是荒北還比較吸引人,簡直是一整個奇怪
主角除了會掉隊幫隊友增加難度和他常常露出震驚的臉以外,好像就沒什麼特殊的魅力了
其他角色反而壞壞惹人愛,可能是我個人的看法啦
請問有其他作品也是類似的情形嗎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.134.17.24
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1433851789.A.E06.html
推
06/09 20:10, , 1F
06/09 20:10, 1F
推
06/09 20:11, , 2F
06/09 20:11, 2F
推
06/09 20:13, , 3F
06/09 20:13, 3F
推
06/09 20:13, , 4F
06/09 20:13, 4F
推
06/09 20:15, , 5F
06/09 20:15, 5F
推
06/09 20:21, , 6F
06/09 20:21, 6F
推
06/09 20:22, , 7F
06/09 20:22, 7F
推
06/09 20:25, , 8F
06/09 20:25, 8F
推
06/09 20:25, , 9F
06/09 20:25, 9F
→
06/09 20:26, , 10F
06/09 20:26, 10F
推
06/09 20:26, , 11F
06/09 20:26, 11F
推
06/09 20:27, , 12F
06/09 20:27, 12F
→
06/09 20:27, , 13F
06/09 20:27, 13F
推
06/09 20:29, , 14F
06/09 20:29, 14F
推
06/09 20:29, , 15F
06/09 20:29, 15F
推
06/09 20:30, , 16F
06/09 20:30, 16F
→
06/09 20:30, , 17F
06/09 20:30, 17F
推
06/09 20:30, , 18F
06/09 20:30, 18F
推
06/09 20:31, , 19F
06/09 20:31, 19F
推
06/09 20:31, , 20F
06/09 20:31, 20F
推
06/09 20:32, , 21F
06/09 20:32, 21F
推
06/09 20:33, , 22F
06/09 20:33, 22F
→
06/09 20:33, , 23F
06/09 20:33, 23F
→
06/09 20:34, , 24F
06/09 20:34, 24F
推
06/09 20:35, , 25F
06/09 20:35, 25F
推
06/09 20:36, , 26F
06/09 20:36, 26F

→
06/09 20:37, , 27F
06/09 20:37, 27F

推
06/09 20:37, , 28F
06/09 20:37, 28F
推
06/09 20:43, , 29F
06/09 20:43, 29F
→
06/09 20:47, , 30F
06/09 20:47, 30F
推
06/09 20:48, , 31F
06/09 20:48, 31F
→
06/09 20:50, , 32F
06/09 20:50, 32F
推
06/09 20:51, , 33F
06/09 20:51, 33F
推
06/09 20:52, , 34F
06/09 20:52, 34F
推
06/09 20:52, , 35F
06/09 20:52, 35F
→
06/09 20:53, , 36F
06/09 20:53, 36F
→
06/09 20:53, , 37F
06/09 20:53, 37F
→
06/09 20:53, , 38F
06/09 20:53, 38F
推
06/09 21:00, , 39F
06/09 21:00, 39F
→
06/09 21:01, , 40F
06/09 21:01, 40F
推
06/09 21:02, , 41F
06/09 21:02, 41F
→
06/09 21:02, , 42F
06/09 21:02, 42F
推
06/09 21:04, , 43F
06/09 21:04, 43F
推
06/09 21:08, , 44F
06/09 21:08, 44F
推
06/09 21:19, , 45F
06/09 21:19, 45F
推
06/09 21:26, , 46F
06/09 21:26, 46F
推
06/09 21:30, , 47F
06/09 21:30, 47F
→
06/09 21:34, , 48F
06/09 21:34, 48F
推
06/09 21:36, , 49F
06/09 21:36, 49F
推
06/09 21:43, , 50F
06/09 21:43, 50F
推
06/09 21:48, , 51F
06/09 21:48, 51F
推
06/09 21:57, , 52F
06/09 21:57, 52F
推
06/09 21:59, , 53F
06/09 21:59, 53F
推
06/09 21:59, , 54F
06/09 21:59, 54F
推
06/09 22:02, , 55F
06/09 22:02, 55F
→
06/09 22:11, , 56F
06/09 22:11, 56F
→
06/09 22:11, , 57F
06/09 22:11, 57F
推
06/09 22:15, , 58F
06/09 22:15, 58F
→
06/09 22:17, , 59F
06/09 22:17, 59F
推
06/09 22:25, , 60F
06/09 22:25, 60F
推
06/09 22:29, , 61F
06/09 22:29, 61F
推
06/09 22:29, , 62F
06/09 22:29, 62F
推
06/09 22:30, , 63F
06/09 22:30, 63F
→
06/09 22:51, , 64F
06/09 22:51, 64F
推
06/09 23:09, , 65F
06/09 23:09, 65F
推
06/10 00:08, , 66F
06/10 00:08, 66F
→
06/10 09:56, , 67F
06/10 09:56, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):