Re: [外電] Wang is right
※ 引述《xiemark (aisinjuro)》之銘言:
: http://blogs.courant.com/baseball/2008/04/wang-is-right.html
: Wang is right
王是右投手...我知道阿...
: By
: Dom Amore
: on April 11, 2008 11:35 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
: For a guy who is not "dominant," not an "ace," Chien-Ming Wang sure wins a
: lot of games. That's 41 since the start of the '06 season, more than
: anyone in baseball.
一般人都說他不算是最頂尖的投手(是我已經不想用王牌這名辭了)
即便他從06年以來已經贏了41場...
: "People want to make a lot out of two postseason starts," Joe Girardi said
: after Wang's two-hitter agianst the Red Sox Friday. "Well. C.C. Sabathia
: won the Cy Young Award and he had some trouble in the postseason. It
: happens."
人們總會想到去年季後賽那兩場...
但是即使是賽揚的CC...也在季後挫賽...
: Wang, of course, pitched a great game at Anaheim in the '05 Division
: Series and beat the Tigers in Game 1 in '06. He was whacked around by the
: Indians last year. My theory:
其實王在05 06年季後賽也投很好..
: There was a big game against Seattle early last September, where Wang
: pitched seven great innings. In the bottom of the seventh, the Yankees
: scored a bunch of runs and, though the game was like 12-1 and Wang had
: been sitting about 45 minutes, they sent him back out there to start the
: eighth. He came out after a couple of pitches, having "stiffened up."
: Coincidence or not, he was not the same after that, the rest ofSeptember
: or in the playoffs. I've always suspected he hurt his back and couldn't
: bend to get his ball to sink.
提起去年九月對西雅圖那戰...
投了七局好球...
七下洋基大轟炸...讓王在休息區坐45分鐘...
然後上來就挫了...
不過現在不一樣了...
他走出去年季後陰霾了...
: Anyway, he's expanding his repertiore now, and using both sides of the
: plate and that could bump him up a level. Because hitters put the ball in
: play against him, he'll probably never be considered a dominant ace, but
: his ability to go deep into games with few pitches will always make him a
: big winner with the Yankees, who tend to score late.
說王又升級了..
他要變成一個大投手了...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.203.49.196
推
04/12 22:41, , 1F
04/12 22:41, 1F
→
04/12 22:41, , 2F
04/12 22:41, 2F
→
04/12 22:43, , 3F
04/12 22:43, 3F
→
04/12 22:44, , 4F
04/12 22:44, 4F
推
04/12 22:45, , 5F
04/12 22:45, 5F
推
04/12 22:46, , 6F
04/12 22:46, 6F
推
04/12 22:47, , 7F
04/12 22:47, 7F
推
04/12 22:55, , 8F
04/12 22:55, 8F
推
04/12 22:58, , 9F
04/12 22:58, 9F
推
04/13 00:21, , 10F
04/13 00:21, 10F
推
04/13 22:06, , 11F
04/13 22:06, 11F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):