Re: [外電] Wins May Push Wang Closer to Cy Young
看完這篇,感覺美國人開始在為今年的賽揚獎下一個伏筆,
這個伏筆就是說
"即使小王有最多勝投,你們那些有投票權的傢伙,
最好也不要給我投給王!否則你們就是不專業,是一群只看勝投數,
而不會分析其他數據的門外漢!!"
而且類似這種論點國外最近出現蠻多篇的,
我想最主要的因素就是網友提出的
"小王是個非傳統數據可分析的強投"。
而這個因素開始讓美國人疑惑了,他們覺得把賽揚獎頒給一個
單純只是勝投數最多的投手,難道是對的嗎?!
在此同時,提此這種質疑的人,卻懶得或不願意像這裡的網友一樣,
提出更多的數據來證明王不只是個勝投王,而且是個不折不扣的強投----雖然是另類的!!
我想這種心理就跟很多美國洋基迷不願承認王是洋基的救世主,是一樣的道理。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.64.249.170
推
09/06 18:16, , 1F
09/06 18:16, 1F
→
09/06 18:17, , 2F
09/06 18:17, 2F
推
09/06 18:18, , 3F
09/06 18:18, 3F
→
09/06 18:19, , 4F
09/06 18:19, 4F
→
09/06 18:18, , 5F
09/06 18:18, 5F
→
09/06 18:20, , 6F
09/06 18:20, 6F
→
09/06 18:22, , 7F
09/06 18:22, 7F
→
09/06 18:26, , 8F
09/06 18:26, 8F
→
09/06 18:32, , 9F
09/06 18:32, 9F
→
09/06 18:33, , 10F
09/06 18:33, 10F
→
09/06 18:34, , 11F
09/06 18:34, 11F
推
09/06 18:35, , 12F
09/06 18:35, 12F
推
09/06 18:36, , 13F
09/06 18:36, 13F
→
09/06 18:36, , 14F
09/06 18:36, 14F
→
09/06 18:37, , 15F
09/06 18:37, 15F
推
09/06 18:36, , 16F
09/06 18:36, 16F
→
09/06 18:38, , 17F
09/06 18:38, 17F
→
09/06 18:39, , 18F
09/06 18:39, 18F
推
09/06 18:37, , 19F
09/06 18:37, 19F
→
09/06 18:40, , 20F
09/06 18:40, 20F
推
09/06 18:45, , 21F
09/06 18:45, 21F
→
09/06 18:46, , 22F
09/06 18:46, 22F
→
09/06 18:46, , 23F
09/06 18:46, 23F
推
09/06 18:46, , 24F
09/06 18:46, 24F
推
09/06 18:56, , 25F
09/06 18:56, 25F
推
09/06 19:06, , 26F
09/06 19:06, 26F
→
09/06 19:07, , 27F
09/06 19:07, 27F
→
09/06 19:07, , 28F
09/06 19:07, 28F
推
09/06 19:15, , 29F
09/06 19:15, 29F
推
09/06 19:17, , 30F
09/06 19:17, 30F
推
09/06 19:31, , 31F
09/06 19:31, 31F
推
09/06 19:58, , 32F
09/06 19:58, 32F
→
09/06 19:59, , 33F
09/06 19:59, 33F
→
09/06 20:00, , 34F
09/06 20:00, 34F
推
09/06 21:25, , 35F
09/06 21:25, 35F
推
09/06 21:30, , 36F
09/06 21:30, 36F
→
09/07 01:44, , 37F
09/07 01:44, 37F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 5 篇):