[Eredan] 純法師套牌
大概完成了一副,所以來寫個心得吧!
首先,別忘了純法師放法術時可以再Chain一張牌。還有純法師戰鬥時只要用法術攻擊的
牌就不會物理攻擊。
所以不用想了,20張牌每一張都要是法術。除了這東西:
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/aGDop8k8.png
Aerouant the Crystalomancer
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/qlhaSRfN.png
Illusory Reflection X2
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/ghESSxiX.png
Lightning Bolt X2
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/C8XaAA2p.png
Lightning Bolt LV2 X1
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/fGfVTs8R.png
Mage's Grand Staff X2
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/aGDop8k8.png
Magic Attack X2
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/IaIqiZcj.png
Static Charge X2
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/9P73aDrX.png
Than the sword X2
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/bun4xyMO.png
The Last Word X1
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/jwTfaK50.png
The pen is mightier... X2
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/Kb4qt2Dg.png
Win using Magic X3
http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/lcRJTrsB.png
======
先來說這三位人物,這個組合其實是很漂亮的互相配合。價位也有點......
Prophet在三級時會再幫其它人物加精神,然後Aerouant又因為他而更難死。而Pilkim當
然是必備的,理所當然的主攻炮手。
再來看看技能發動的回合....
Prophet 2 4 7 防加2
Aerouant 2 5 8 精神加1
Pilkim 1 3 5 精神加2
簡單來說,不管誰先手,第一輪都能確保有二位能發動。第二輪時至少有一位,第三輪後
還有機會再確保一位發動。
而純法師套牌的特色就是每次戰鬥幾乎都能用掉二張牌。牌組大量放入的龍系法術也讓
4級Pilkim幾乎可以確保他上陣時都隨時可以防加二。
在法術牌放這麼多的情況下,戰術其實也很單純了。
能用法術轟就轟下去!
不行的話物攻灌下去,或是Magic Attack下去,也能雙管齊下地砍爆敵人。
對了! Tha Last Word 用在Pilkim身上時的效果超驚人。我曾在第一回合就Pilkim +
The Last Word + Fireball,直接13點傷害秒掉一個精神為0血才13點的對方角色。
也曾用上過杖的Pilkim + The Last Word + Than the sword,把Pilkim的物攻最高值灌
到20點一刀爆人。
如果再多收幾張貴的要死的法傷卡,這組會更爆力呀!
不過這套牌現在的價位就很高了......
光Prophet這位法師的價位就.......(汗)
當然也可以用其它法師代替,其實選擇也不少。但這組合的暴力度應該是最高的。 XD
--
「把已經倒下的人們的願望,還有未來的人們的希望,把這二種心情全都織入雙重螺旋
之中,挖出通往明天的道路。那就是天元突破,那就是Gurren-Lagann,
我的鑽頭....是用來開天闢地的鑽頭啊!!」
── 西蒙 《天元突破 紅蓮之眼》
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.248.204.55
※ 編輯: wizardfizban 來自: 111.248.204.55 (02/06 01:15)
推
02/06 01:18, , 1F
02/06 01:18, 1F
推
02/06 01:44, , 2F
02/06 01:44, 2F
推
02/06 01:47, , 3F
02/06 01:47, 3F
→
02/06 01:47, , 4F
02/06 01:47, 4F
→
02/06 01:48, , 5F
02/06 01:48, 5F
推
02/06 01:52, , 6F
02/06 01:52, 6F
→
02/06 01:52, , 7F
02/06 01:52, 7F
→
02/06 01:55, , 8F
02/06 01:55, 8F
→
02/06 01:55, , 9F
02/06 01:55, 9F
推
02/06 01:56, , 10F
02/06 01:56, 10F
推
02/06 01:56, , 11F
02/06 01:56, 11F
→
02/06 01:57, , 12F
02/06 01:57, 12F
→
02/06 01:58, , 13F
02/06 01:58, 13F
→
02/06 01:58, , 14F
02/06 01:58, 14F
推
02/06 02:00, , 15F
02/06 02:00, 15F
→
02/06 02:00, , 16F
02/06 02:00, 16F
→
02/06 02:00, , 17F
02/06 02:00, 17F
→
02/06 02:01, , 18F
02/06 02:01, 18F
→
02/06 02:02, , 19F
02/06 02:02, 19F
→
02/06 02:02, , 20F
02/06 02:02, 20F
→
02/06 02:03, , 21F
02/06 02:03, 21F
推
02/06 02:04, , 22F
02/06 02:04, 22F
→
02/06 02:05, , 23F
02/06 02:05, 23F
推
02/06 02:09, , 24F
02/06 02:09, 24F
→
02/06 02:09, , 25F
02/06 02:09, 25F
→
02/06 02:16, , 26F
02/06 02:16, 26F
推
02/06 02:28, , 27F
02/06 02:28, 27F
→
02/06 02:29, , 28F
02/06 02:29, 28F
→
02/06 02:29, , 29F
02/06 02:29, 29F
推
02/06 02:30, , 30F
02/06 02:30, 30F
推
02/06 02:34, , 31F
02/06 02:34, 31F
推
02/06 02:35, , 32F
02/06 02:35, 32F
→
02/06 02:35, , 33F
02/06 02:35, 33F
→
02/06 02:37, , 34F
02/06 02:37, 34F
→
02/06 02:38, , 35F
02/06 02:38, 35F
推
02/06 02:39, , 36F
02/06 02:39, 36F
推
02/06 02:40, , 37F
02/06 02:40, 37F
→
02/06 02:40, , 38F
02/06 02:40, 38F
→
02/06 02:41, , 39F
02/06 02:41, 39F
→
02/06 02:41, , 40F
02/06 02:41, 40F
→
02/06 02:41, , 41F
02/06 02:41, 41F
→
02/06 02:42, , 42F
02/06 02:42, 42F
→
02/06 02:43, , 43F
02/06 02:43, 43F
→
02/06 02:43, , 44F
02/06 02:43, 44F
→
02/06 02:44, , 45F
02/06 02:44, 45F
推
02/06 03:15, , 46F
02/06 03:15, 46F
→
02/06 03:15, , 47F
02/06 03:15, 47F
→
02/06 03:16, , 48F
02/06 03:16, 48F
推
02/06 03:18, , 49F
02/06 03:18, 49F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):