Re: defining 0day

看板Bugtraq作者時間18年前 (2007/09/28 02:13), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串10/12 (看更多)
> As a professional, I would be happy to see terms like '0day' banished > from the lexicon entirely. It's an essentially meaningless -- all > third-party exploits are zero-day to _somebody_ -- term of boast co- > opted from the warez scene, and we can do perfectly well without it. I'd accept that. Can we agree on a term that means: "Right now you're learning about a vulnerability for which there is a working exploit, and no way to protect yourself short of impacting the availability of your systems by unplugging them or disabling the affected service."? I'd propose "unpatched vulnerability with known working exploit", but it's kind of verbose, and I don't think some of the kids joining our ranks can string that many complete words together anymore (too much texting). Terry #include <stddisclaim.h>
文章代碼(AID): #16-_BU00 (Bugtraq)
文章代碼(AID): #16-_BU00 (Bugtraq)